BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 1,803
- 1,080
thats more competitive in everyones books.Well what? They would have lost 5-1 with Seth Jones. I guess that's more competitive in your books.
thats more competitive in everyones books.Well what? They would have lost 5-1 with Seth Jones. I guess that's more competitive in your books.
It's not being competitive at all, in my book.thats more competitive in everyones books.
You are making up an imaginary score to try and save your point. Just so you know where your at.It's not being competitive at all, in my book.
My whole argument the whole time was that we aren't competitive at all, even with him in the lineup. You can cherry pick stats all you want, but they are getting dominated in almost every game from an advanced stat POV with, or without Seth in the lineup.You are making up an imaginary score to try and save your point. Just so you know where your at.
In reality they were within 2 goals in 24 of 28 games with Jones in the lineup. Without Jones they have played 2 games and have lost by 4 and by 6. He plays 30 min a night and is there best defenseman. Replacing him with AHL defenseman makes the team less competitive.