Toggle sidebar

Value of: Best offer for Tanev

ACC1224

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
74,145
39,943
WilliamNylander said:
Something around Gauthier as a centerpiece?
Click to expand...

There's two words you'd never think you'd hear in the same sentence.

Right now he'd be the centerpiece for a 3rd round pick not the most valuable defenseman in the league.
 

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
JonnyCanuck604 said:
so Nylander had 3 more goals then horvat was a minus player on a team that was top 10 in every category Like I said how many of his assist were the result of Mathews.

I like some of the leafs Austin Mitch Morgan JVR. they actually backcheck. Reilly a minus 20 tho ouch and you are gonna say you don't need a guy like Tanev on his line? you would have one of the best top pairings in the league.

Kapp = your 1st is more then fair. 20 goal scores are not that rare. Elite shutdown d are. Oh and btw besides this year he played in 70 games both seasons before about par for a top pairing D
Click to expand...

Ahh okay. So you don't watch the leafs play ever. Got it.

Rielly played with a high ankle sprain all year btw.

There is no way I'd give up Kapp+1st for 3 years of Tanev missing like 15 games a season.
 

MissionCanucksFan

Registered User
Mar 2, 2014
685
7
RCS said:
leafer, I know you are a huge fan of Tanev. Sorry I just do not see it. No way I give up a legit 1st line LW for him. In fact I would not offer anyone for him, he does nothing that impresses me...slow, injury prone and old.
Click to expand...

Ya...he is 27
 
SelltheTeamFrancesco

SelltheTeamFrancesco

Registered User
Aug 11, 2015
3,809
3,868
Ziggdiezan said:
Ahh okay. So you don't watch the leafs play ever. Got it.

Rielly played with a high ankle sprain all year btw.

There is no way I'd give up Kapp+1st for 3 years of Tanev missing like 15 games a season.
Click to expand...

I am sure all year, even if that true tanev played with 3 injuries for more than 30 games. Just realize Morgan Reilly is not a number one get over it.
 
BlueBaron

BlueBaron

Registered User
May 29, 2006
15,674
6,308
Sarnia, On
Scoringking19 said:
Nylander straight up? No? Didn't think so. (Subject has been beaten to death) Move along leafs fan :)
Click to expand...

ROFL

Last I checked this is a public forum. Making a high demand and dismissing me is something special, socially obtuse.

I understand Blue and White makes some Canucks fans go insane and lose all common sense but I came here to make a constructive offer. I demonstrated to one poster who liked an offer that we had presented him with higher value he chose to ignore. Why this merits your childish response we will leave to the "who cares?" category.

You are probably the one who should move along if you cannot have a mature rational discussion.
 
Snatcher Demko

Snatcher Demko

High-End Intangibles
Oct 8, 2006
5,968
1,389
I'd bet Tanev's injuries won't be a concern playing for an attacking team like the Leafs. The Canucks were the opposite and Tanev was the primary target for opposing teams all year on an injury riddled team.

I think the following deals would be considered fair, in order from most preferable to least:

- Tanev for Buffalo's 6OA

- Tanev for Alex Nylander

- Tanev for Kapanen + Leafs 1st

That last one is a "maybe" and depends on what relative offers would look like for Gudbranson. That's about the bare minimum to move a top-pairing guy like Tanev.
 
Cogburn

Cogburn

Pretend they're yachts.
May 28, 2010
15,080
4,477
Vancouver
Momesso said:
I'd bet Tanev's injuries won't be a concern playing for an attacking team like the Leafs. The Canucks were the opposite and Tanev was the primary target for opposing teams all year on an injury riddled team.

I think the following deals would be considered fair, in order from most preferable to least:

- Tanev for Buffalo's 6OA

- Tanev for Alex Nylander

- Tanev for Kapanen + Leafs 1st

That last one is a "maybe" and depends on what relative offers would look like for Gudbranson. That's about the bare minimum to move a top-pairing guy like Tanev.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the summary, seems I haven't missed too much in this thread since my last visit. So should Vancouver's people call Buffalos people?
 
Zip15

Zip15

Registered User
Jun 3, 2009
28,121
5,401
Bodymore
Momesso said:
I'd bet Tanev's injuries won't be a concern playing for an attacking team like the Leafs. The Canucks were the opposite and Tanev was the primary target for opposing teams all year on an injury riddled team.

I think the following deals would be considered fair, in order from most preferable to least:

- Tanev for Buffalo's 6OA

- Tanev for Alex Nylander

- Tanev for Kapanen + Leafs 1st

That last one is a "maybe" and depends on what relative offers would look like for Gudbranson. That's about the bare minimum to move a top-pairing guy like Tanev.
Click to expand...

If Buffalo was a beneficiary of the lottery and moved up to 2nd overall, what, if anything, would Vancouver be willing to add to Tanev? (Were that the case, I think Buffalo would try to pull off the Nylander deal and then draft Patrick/Hischier, but I'm interested to see what 'Nucks fans have to offer for 2OA.)
 
Snatcher Demko

Snatcher Demko

High-End Intangibles
Oct 8, 2006
5,968
1,389
Zip15 said:
If Buffalo was a beneficiary of the lottery and moved up to 2nd overall, what, if anything, would Vancouver be willing to add to Tanev? (Were that the case, I think Buffalo would try to pull off the Nylander deal and then draft Patrick/Hischier, but I'm interested to see what 'Nucks fans have to offer for 2OA.)
Click to expand...

It would also depend on where Vancouver ends up drafting.

For the 2OA, I'd add significantly to Tanev.

Goldobin or Granlund? Both are future 20 goal scorers on cheap contracts. Granlund would have had 20 this year, and Goldobin IMO is a certainly a better prospect offensively than Granlund. But Granlund can play on 3 lines and is responsible in his own end.

Sutter could be added as well but 1) he'd have to waive and 2) I'd imagine Buffalo would want to send salary back.
 

scorvat53

Registered User
Jan 21, 2017
433
18
Momesso said:
I'd bet Tanev's injuries won't be a concern playing for an attacking team like the Leafs. The Canucks were the opposite and Tanev was the primary target for opposing teams all year on an injury riddled team.

I think the following deals would be considered fair, in order from most preferable to least:

- Tanev for Buffalo's 6OA

- Tanev for Alex Nylander

- Tanev for Kapanen + Leafs 1st

That last one is a "maybe" and depends on what relative offers would look like for Gudbranson. That's about the bare minimum to move a top-pairing guy like Tanev.
Click to expand...

The only one i'd do but someone would have to drop. Would have liked nylander..thats who I wanted the canucks to draft but with goldibin in town, there isn't really a point of getting another goal scoring winger when what we need is a young centre.


Canucks would be digging them selfs a hole if they traded tanev thou, GAA suicide.
 
82Ninety42011

82Ninety42011

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
7,726
5,765
Abbotsford BC
If we could get Sabres 6OA and one of Makar or Liljegren is there I'd pull the trigger. I think Makar is an offensive stud and Liljegren is better then he played this year. The mono really took a bite out of him and I think once he gets his strength/energy back he'll show what he can do.
 

maaran

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
366
23
Canada
I think Tanev to Philadelphia could work, they need a right handed defenceman and they should be going for the playoffs considering they have a playoff-worthy roster. Travis Konecny would be cool as a return considering he is Horvat's cousin.
 
dasaybz

dasaybz

da saybz
Aug 2, 2005
2,748
1,953
716
Freaking Tanev for 6 overall?? Hahahha, come on.

Or Tanev for Alex Nylander .. hahah, is this the real world?
 
Leafin

Leafin

Registered User
Apr 2, 2009
1,181
160
Tanev is a good defender but i think the return will be less than many think. He's not a 1st pairing all situation defender. This guy doesn't contribute enough offensively.

He is a really good defensive defender with good skating and puck handling ability. I haven't seen many trades where those types are traded for major hauls.
 
clunk

clunk

Registered User
Dec 10, 2015
11,343
5,418
I'm gonna..
Leafin said:
Tanev is a good defender but i think the return will be less than many think. He's not a 1st pairing all situation defender. This guy doesn't contribute enough offensively.

He is a really good defensive defender with good skating and puck handling ability. I haven't seen many trades where those types are traded for major hauls.
Click to expand...

Uhh.... Adam Larsson for Taylor Hall?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom