Beezeral
Registered User
- Mar 1, 2010
- 9,881
- 4,692
Proposal: Barkov in MTL
- Thread starter Lockin17
- Start date
Barkov is an ELITE NHL player. I don’t see anything Montreal that Florida would take outside of ever winning the lottery.
Kaiden Ghoul
Youppi va t’il devoir chauser ses patins calvaince
- Jan 19, 2020
- 942
- 696
Not a good move to make right now...
Young Top 4 LHD should be the priority
Good God Does even Gretzky even return that much lol
And that's if it's Florida that want to blow it out and if Bergevin really think we can win with that D lol...
Weber Fleury Kulak Chariot Mete Juulsen Folin.... dude
that's like the worst dmen transition since Brisebois was our no.1 D...
Young Top 4 LHD should be the priority
Good God Does even Gretzky even return that much lol
And that's if it's Florida that want to blow it out and if Bergevin really think we can win with that D lol...
Weber Fleury Kulak Chariot Mete Juulsen Folin.... dude
that's like the worst dmen transition since Brisebois was our no.1 D...
Last edited:
And the funny thing in is that other deal Montreal probably would end up the winner (although still detrimental to them because the Habs have a bunch of needs). Also, there's no untouchables if the trade involves Barkov.
Flyer lurker
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2019
- 9,752
- 12,571
Per value wise its not garbage but why would Florida want as one of the pieces a "resigned" 33 year old Petry? They all ready have an overpaid older pp d vet in Yandle. They are going to give Petry say 4 years and make it 2 overpriced older d-men? Figure Florida would have to trade Petry for hopefully a 1+ package and then trade is Domi, pick 8, pick 20-25 ish, b prospect. It ain't bad but it takes Florida admitting they are trying to win in 2024 and not now.
What a joke thread. So, basically, Florida gives away their top two centers over the span of a couple months. That center depth would be worst in the league by a mile.
As I've said before, elsewhere:
FL is not gonna deal Barkov unless there is enough overall profit incl long term
'equal' value will not cut it
shoe on the other foot, trade partner gutting its club to get a deal cuts the nose to spite the face, not desirable.
historic precedent is something like Lindros deal, which Rangers can approximate:
2 1sts this year, + primo young asset (Deangelo) + other desirable components [more desirable adds and taking on some of FL undesirable contracts].
FL has to make honest eval if better to keep Barkov now or wait 2 years and then he is UFA and looking at 11m or more salary. If not tied up long term before for such $, he is a productive rental, but he is still a rental without term.
Thus logic suggests he is worth more now than later.
Whether or not that is enough of a plus to be worth more than Barkov production to Panthers now is a dif ? for FL to consider.
FL is not gonna deal Barkov unless there is enough overall profit incl long term
'equal' value will not cut it
shoe on the other foot, trade partner gutting its club to get a deal cuts the nose to spite the face, not desirable.
historic precedent is something like Lindros deal, which Rangers can approximate:
2 1sts this year, + primo young asset (Deangelo) + other desirable components [more desirable adds and taking on some of FL undesirable contracts].
FL has to make honest eval if better to keep Barkov now or wait 2 years and then he is UFA and looking at 11m or more salary. If not tied up long term before for such $, he is a productive rental, but he is still a rental without term.
Thus logic suggests he is worth more now than later.
Whether or not that is enough of a plus to be worth more than Barkov production to Panthers now is a dif ? for FL to consider.
Barkov will be hunted by the Bruins once Bergeron contract expires. Barkov a UFA at same time. Bruins will make him the next Bergeron in Boston. All this just my opinion of course.
they’ll do everything to keep him, he’s shown nothing but a desire to stay, they’ll operate as if he’s going to be a lifer.
Lmao, not if he’s locked up with the Panthers long term!
Except, the Panthers might have something to say about that. Why don't Boston "hunt" for Eichel or Matthews or MacKinnon etc. when their contract is up?
lol, well Barkov will still be wearing Panthers’ red when we get down that road. Guaranteed
