sandysan
Registered User
- Dec 7, 2011
- 24,834
- 6,388
So backstrom doesn't get a medal? If that's true then it sucks hard, wow.
If coaches don't get medals, I'm not crying a river that dopers don't either.
So backstrom doesn't get a medal? If that's true then it sucks hard, wow.
So when is the B-test going to be public?
Actually pseudoephedrine has only been banned (most recently) for four years by the IOC.
It was taken off the banned list after a situation not that different than the Backstrom case when a Romanian gymnast's team doctors approved her taking cold medicine and she tested positive for pseudoephedrine after the fact and had her gold medal taken away, which everyone but the Olympics thought was a huge injustice and mistake. THe IOC's way of dealing with the fall-out was to leave pseudoephedrine off the banned list for several years (but not give that gymnast her gold medal back) until reinstating the ban right before the 2010 Winter Olympics.
No, really it's about you pushing Pekka Päivärinta in '72 and then making a protest to disqualify the whole run and having Paavo Nurmi declared as a pro and thus unedigible to participate in... Berlin, was it?
If coaches don't get medals, I'm not crying a river that dopers don't either.
I don't think it was either. Sounds like the labs were backed up, similar to what happened in London a couple years ago.
No, really it's about you pushing Pekka Päivärinta in '72 and then making a protest to disqualify the whole run and having Paavo Nurmi declared as a pro and thus unedigible to participate in... Berlin, was it?
But they did raise the amount of pseudo-ephedrine you can have on your body just for that reason, to avoid same kind of mistakes that they made with that Romanian gymnastic. He just took too much of it and imo rules are rules.
Like Teemu said in Sel8nne documentary, "Rules are rules and everyone knows them. I think it should be one "burn" and you are out". Well, at least that`s basically what he said and i think i have to agree with him.
From the IIHF link about Visnovsky in 2010:
A luxury not awarded to Bäckström even though he tested after the quarter final.
Its Nicklas Backstrom, the dudes harmless and he was their #1C and got them there, its like Crosby not getting a medal because he took a allergy pill the morning of the game
Saw an interview whit Landeskog saying they havent analyzed the b-test yetDidnt they say it was positive as well on Viasat?
Yup. Basically what they've said is that 150mcg/mL is what they'd expect to see in the case of an overdose, which is why the Finnish anti-doping guy said that 190mcg/mL can't be achieved through legitimate usage.
Sorry to bust your balls again, but it should be mcg/L, since otherwise it's 15% of his urine that's pseudoephedrine
That's because it took them 4 days to get the first result. In a timely fashion he could've done a follow up on Friday to see if it was a anomaly and have a hearing. Now they waited until he was dressed for the Warm-up on Sunday before playing a Final in the Olympics. As Tommy Boustedt says, It's either politics or the IOC are incompetent. IIHC was going to allow Bäckström to play.
'32. Los Angeles?
Yup. Basically what they've said is that 150mcg/mL is what they'd expect to see in the case of an overdose, which is why the Finnish anti-doping guy said that 190mcg/mL can't be achieved through legitimate usage.
Yeah... can't remember the particulars but we still are mightily pissed over that one.
Because they didn't get the test result until 2 and half hours before the final.
The IOC has gone way over the lines in many cases and will continue to do so in the future until they are reigned in. Let's also ban caffeine, and sugar. No coffee, no candy bar between periods. It's cheating!! Simple as that.
Did something like this happen to our Canadian rower (Silken Laumenn) (sp) several years ago? Pretty much a joke, but I really do not think it would have changed the outcome.