The reports that they are basically using their cushion as an opportunity to teach is encouraging in that it means there's method to the madness. Nothing would worry me more than a management team that wants the team to play like this. But if it's done to instill certain values with a focus on certain things, cost what it may cost in terms of performance, then it might do long-term good and, most importantly, have an expiration date.
Good post. It's almost as if the smart hockey minds we hired have a smart hockey plan... who would have thought?
And the whiners and Babcock-bashers on this thread don't have a plan at all, they just know what they don't like about Babcock's "old school ways".
We're a good young team and have the perfect coach to help develop our players into good overall players, not just one-dimensional cut-outs.