lionsDen
Hated And Proud
- Jan 26, 2022
- 3,483
- 2,242
Props to those who hated this move in the offseason I was cautiously optimistic… boy was I wrong
I was probably the most optimistic about it. I really thought RyJo was gonna have like a 60 point season for this team playing 2C. I’ve been wrong before, but man was I wrong about this oneProps to those who hated this move in the offseason I was cautiously optimistic… boy was I wrong
I was probably the most optimistic about it. I really thought RyJo was gonna have like a 60 point season for this team playing 2C. I’ve been wrong before, but man was I wrong about this one
Props to those who hated this move in the offseason
Colorado could have kept Kadri for a lesser AAV and decided not to. Now you're offering him back with his the 2 best years on his contract missing and want Byram in return.Hey avs fans, I posted a trade proposal on another board to get RyJo off your hands for a 2C, and just wondered what your take would be on it.
To Avs:
Nazem Kadri - $7M @ 6 years (including this one)
To Flames:
RyJo - $4M @ 2 years (incl. this one)
Byram - $3.85 @ 2 years (incl. this one)
Salary change:
Salaries almost match perfectly ($7M vs $7.85M).
CGY takes on an additional $850k, COL reduces salary by $850k
Why?
- Kadri is performing well for the flames, but given that they're "retooling" I don't see Kadri's skillset being maximized
- COL is looking for a short (current season) and long-term solution for 2C
- it's anticipated CGY is trading away Tanev for sure, and sources say Hanifin is likely as well. As such, Flames will need Defence to replace the losses of Tanev and Hanifin
- Byram fits the retool in CGY, Kadri already has established chemistry with the Avs, and RyJo has negative trade value
- COL gets $850k additional TDL flexibility to acquire a G?
Essentially, Byram covers the cost of 2 transactions: acquiring Kadri + removing RyJo and his cap hit. No other picks or prospects in the trade, no salary retention (retaining on Kadri for 6 years would usually come at an additional cost).
*Worth mentioning: Salary Cap is going up $4.2M next season.
Is this too slanted in Colorado's favor? CGY's favor? What would you do if you were the GM of the Avs when presented with this? Have at it.
Actually it is more like leaving your car on the side of the road for somebody to take for free and then buy back.Colorado could have kept Kadri for a lesser AAV and decided not to. Now you're offering him back with his the 2 best years on his contract missing and want Byram in return.
That's like selling your old car for $4000, having seller remorse and buying it back for $10,000 after the new owner has put 50 000 miles on it.
You understand that regardless of the fit it doesn't make sense for the Avs to trade for Kadri unless there's a significant retention.
Colorado could have kept Kadri for a lesser AAV and decided not to. Now you're offering him back with his the 2 best years on his contract missing and want Byram in return.
That's like selling your old car for $4000, having seller remorse and buying it back for $10,000 after the new owner has put 50 000 miles on it.
You understand that regardless of the fit it doesn't make sense for the Avs to trade for Kadri.
Thanks Dahrougem2. I appreciate the response.I would happily take Kadri back.
I would not use Byram to do it.
By "comfortable," do you mean comfortable with shooting him into the sun? Because I think that's where most of us are at. He's appalling.Thanks Dahrougem2. I appreciate the response.
I was using Byram because he's a position of need for CGY and I see him so far down your depth chart because the Avs are stacked at LD. Also, I'm getting the sense that you guys are more comfortable with RyJo than I thought... my whole proposal is based on getting rid of him and his salary so that you can compete better for a cup this season and the next bunch. Sure, you could get rid of RyJo elsewhere, maybe for a first round pick or something, but then you still have to pay a price for his replacement too... if not Byram, who helps you start a convo with a rival GM for a 2C? I thought of my proposal like a "2-for-1" or "1 stop shop" to get your 2C and get rid of RyJo, with an appropriate price tag that was aimed at a position of strength (and thus, wouldn't hurt you too much).
Are there any counter offers out there? Just trying to gauge what the fanbase is thinking (I have read previous posts as well)
Cheers everyone! Happy Super Bowl!
SoldHey avs fans, I posted a trade proposal on another board to get RyJo off your hands for a 2C, and just wondered what your take would be on it.
To Avs:
Nazem Kadri - $7M @ 6 years (including this one)
To Flames:
RyJo - $4M @ 2 years (incl. this one)
Byram - $3.85 @ 2 years (incl. this one)
Salary change:
Salaries almost match perfectly ($7M vs $7.85M).
CGY takes on an additional $850k, COL reduces salary by $850k
Why?
- Kadri is performing well for the flames, but given that they're "retooling" I don't see Kadri's skillset being maximized
- COL is looking for a short (current season) and long-term solution for 2C
- it's anticipated CGY is trading away Tanev for sure, and sources say Hanifin is likely as well. As such, Flames will need Defence to replace the losses of Tanev and Hanifin
- Byram fits the retool in CGY, Kadri already has established chemistry with the Avs, and RyJo has negative trade value
- COL gets $850k additional TDL flexibility to acquire a G?
Essentially, Byram covers the cost of 2 transactions: acquiring Kadri + removing RyJo and his cap hit. No other picks or prospects in the trade, no salary retention (retaining on Kadri for 6 years would usually come at an additional cost).
*Worth mentioning: Salary Cap is going up $4.2M next season.
Is this too slanted in Colorado's favor? CGY's favor? What would you do if you were the GM of the Avs when presented with this? Have at it.
This is the spirit!Thankfully we have our #2C signed for next season as well
Close, he said "there's nothing that says that Johansen should play more than Colton"...and that was early in the season still.Earlier in the season Jared said something along the lines of "theres nothing that says Johansen has to be the 2C"
I like it cause gets rid of ryjo solves one hole leaves us assets to possibly get a goalie. Gives us a 2c not perfect but I’d do it. And the front office shouldn’t give two shots about optics right nowBy "comfortable," do you mean comfortable with shooting him into the sun? Because I think that's where most of us are at. He's appalling.
Anyways, I'd say you're getting "no's" to Byram for Kadri for two reasons:
- if we move Byram, most would prefer it's in a package for a younger center. Kadri is great; he's also 33.
- From an optics perspective it just won't happen. CMac let Kadri walk for nothing; imagine if two years later he trades one of the Avs' top young players to get him back...?
By "comfortable," do you mean comfortable with shooting him into the sun? Because I think that's where most of us are at. He's appalling.
Anyways, I'd say you're getting "no's" to Byram for Kadri for two reasons:
- if we move Byram, most would prefer it's in a package for a younger center. Kadri is great; he's also 33.
- From an optics perspective it just won't happen. CMac let Kadri walk for nothing; imagine if two years later he trades one of the Avs' top young players to get him back...?
Hes pretty much saying what i said then since Colton is a 3C lol but yah. Jared doesnt need to play Johansen at all if he didnt wanna. Better players have been scratched before.Close, he said "there's nothing that says that Johansen should play more than Colton"...and that was early in the season still.
Don't you say that about Nathan!Tyler Arnason
Nate Guenin
Ryan Johanson
Welcome to my top-3 most hated Avs, and climbing fast!
"He won't be lazy."
He simply can't move. He looks like a beer league player with pros all around him.Laziest player in Avs history. Seriously, this guy makes Arnason and Wolski look like they have Forsbergs determination. Its unacceptable that Jared plays this guy. Enough already. Earlier in the season Jared said something along the lines of "theres nothing that says Johansen has to be the 2C" Theres also nothing that says you have to play the guy so stop it.
Props to those who hated this move in the offseason I was cautiously optimistic… boy was I wrong