Dreakmur
Registered User
Can anyone suggest a player on the board better than Hec Kilrea or is it too late?
Depends what kind of player you want.
Can anyone suggest a player on the board better than Hec Kilrea or is it too late?
McDavid has a pretty huge lead in non-PP points, right? He has no help.
McDavid has a pretty huge lead in non-PP points, right? He has no help.
I wouldn't call Draisaitl "no help".
Though opponents don't have much to worry about from most of the rest of the team, true.
Their F's are actually decent enough even beyond Drai. Their problem is the D sucks and apparently Cam Talbot took a big step back, from the 6-7 Edmonton games i caught in full this year and listening to the sane Edmonton fans out there. Plus their GM is a dolt and I don't think they have the right coach behind the bench.
Their F are not decent at all. They've got excellent depth at C, as Drai is a natural center. Their wingers, however, suck.. Milan Lucic leads them in scoring. That says all you need to know.
Suck is a strong word. They aren't great or even good, but I'd say I could find a number of teams with more trash on the wings than Edmonton. Again, how different is this team from last years bunch?
Say what? Lucic is currently tied for 84th in scoring among LW, and he is the leading scorer at wing for the Oilers..
This is one of the worst group of wingers in the league, and quite possibly in the history of the sport.
What's different from last year is that they had Jordan Eberle last year, who would very easily be their best winger this year. To say Strome has been disappointing would be an understatement.
1) Look at previous older Oilers teams to see why this is untrue
2) Eberle had checked out on this team and after being a total non factor in the playoffs was a goner. I'm happy for him finding success with the Islanders but he was never going to have a season like that again here.
He scored 51 points last year. He couldn't have been that bad.
What does that matter in an MVP discussion? Yes, his even strength scoring is extremely impressive but it's still just a single number.
This is largely the same damn team that just went to game 7 in the 2nd round last year. And they're back to being a lottery team. Winning the Art Ross should matter very little in all reality here. Unless he went ballistic and beat everyone in the scoring race by like 25-30 points I'm not budging off the mindset that you can be the MVP of the league on a **** team. There isn't much further down the Oilers could have went this year. Losing McDavid only makes them a lock to challenge for the 1st pick instead of a likely 4-7 draft slot.
McDavid has a pretty huge lead in non-PP points, right? He has no help.
He’s on track to lead the league in even strength scoring by the largest margin since Jagr in 1999.
I’m confused. I mean, everything you said above is fine, but if that’s what you believe, you can’t have Kucherov as your MVP. Either it’s about value to your team or it’s about who is the best player. It can be a combination but the weights should be equal for all players.
Kucherov is not his team’s most valuable player, so how can he be league MVP if that’s your main criteria?
Kucherov HAS been his teams best player all year. He's easily been the most consistent player on the Bolts from day 1. That's in line with what I've seen with my own two eyes and what most Tampa fans will tell you.
So, my belief is that he's the best player on Tampa in 2017-18 AND the team has been the best (or arguably so) in the NHL all year.
Where was McDavid in the scoring race a few weeks back? You can't reward a guy who goes on a tear over the last 5-6 weeks of the season for a **** team. Period. A month ago Connor M's season was a pretty big disappointment on an individual level. It isn't now, because he's likely hitting 100 points again BUT he consistency should matter, among other things. And of course, how well a team shows matters.
Give McDavid the Art Ross. Hell give him the Lindsay. But as far as the Hart goes, it should be down to guys like Kuch, MacKinnon, Malkin and to a lesser degree Rinne, Giroux, even Taylor Hall etc. Those guys have all been just as or very close to as impressive statistically speaking and are leading their teams to the postseason.
Honestly, McDavid isn't even in my top-5 for MVP. In no particular order- Kucherov, Kopitar, MacKinnon, Malkin, Hall would be my top 5.
So the league MVP is the leading scorer of a play-off team.... even if he is not that team's MVP.
To be fair, Kucherov is probably the lowest on that list for me. What Hall/MacK/Kopitar are doing is pretty nuts. They are my top , Malkin 4, Kucherov 5.
You seem pretty certain Kucherov isnt TB's MVP... I think he has been consistently the most impressive. So... different strokes, I guess.
Best player is not the same as most valuable. Both Vasilevskey and Hedman are more valuable to Tampa Bay this season. Kucherov and Stamkos are close 3rd and 4th.