Springfield is sad to see Tumba go. Luckily however, the offensive centre spot is one of the more easily replaceable positions in this draft, and a guy we had discussed earlier is still around. As his replacement, we select a young man who has quickly established himself as one of the best offensive players in the NHL, with over a PPG in both the regular season and playoffs and a career +70:
Jason Spezza
Did no one all ready take him? I was sure he had been.
I suspected he might have been gone too, but I can't find him listed anywhere in either of the drafts...
Yeah, and actually, he's property of Estevan.I think Samuelsson is already gone, isn't he? Upon close inspection, he was taken by you in the 2nd round...I'm so confused, lol
I think Samuelsson is already gone, isn't he? Upon close inspection, he was taken by you in the 2nd round...I'm so confused, lol
Trouble withh Billy reay is that he never won the cup despite having a team with the most talent.The Penticton Vees are pleased to select, after much deliberation, its head coach Billy Reay, the definitive player's coach whose character is demonstrated by the photo below and the fact that - as a player himself in an earlier era - he started the practice of raising the hockey stick after scoring a goal. Read the bottom write-up on his coaching style.
http://www.legendsofhockey.net:8080/LegendsOfHockey/jsp/SearchPlayer.jsp?player=14087
http://www.ahiha.org/articles.asp?ID=24&Path=T1,0003
Damn Canadiens stood in his way!Trouble withh Billy reay is that he never won the cup despite having a team with the most talent.
Maybe I am too critical but those 60's Blackhawk teams were loaded & should have won a couple of more cups. If you have the talent but don't win, then you gotta blame the coach. Reay probly deserves to be picked at this point but he is not up there wiith Blake & Im;ach.Damn Canadiens stood in his way!
Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals in 1965 (Habs Beliveau Conn Smythe winner)
Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals in 1971 (Habs Dryden Conn Smythe winner)
and
Game 6 Stanley Cup Finals in 1973 (Habs Conn Smythe Cournoyer, league +/- leader Habs Laperriere and while the Hawks had no first team all-stars, the Habs had three first team all-stars that season: Dryden, Lapointe, Mahovlich)
As a coach he could be held on par with any two- or three-time Cup winner. Anyone who attributes coaching as the difference in game seven of a championship final is espousing a minority opinion. The coach got them there, the all-time great players make the difference.
As a regular season coach he's one of the best in this draft and should be only a plus in reflecting on regular season ranking when you vote.
He sure is up there with Pat Quinn (15 of 17 seasons made the playoffs) and any one cup wonder.he is not up there wiith Blake & Imlach
I agree, clutch goal tending means a lot. HOFER Tony Esposito in 71 still gives me nightmares.His goaltending was often beat come playoff time, darn Tony Esposito!
He sure is up there with Pat Quinn (15 of 17 seasons made the playoffs) and any one cup wonder.
Between now and Thursday (via PM to me):
(1) RANK the teams from 1 to 10 (leave your team OUT of the rankings please)
(2) IDENTIFY the ONE best performing player for EACH of the ten other teams (all-star voting)
(3) IDENTIFY 1 to 3 great powerplay teams and 1 to 3 great penalty kill teams (see post at end of roster thread: if you choose more than one, then rank them)
Also, by Thursday, vote on which option for playoff format you'd want, A or B
(4) VOTE on playoff format option
Option A: The standard format: the top-8 ranked teams from the regular season make the playoffs and play a simple three-round championship, 1 vs. 8, 2 vs. 7, etc.
Option B: The tourney format: The top seed after the regular season sits out the first round and all ten other teams square off (#2 vs. #11, #3 vs. #10, etc) in the first round. In the second round, the six remaining teams square off. In the third round, a tourney of the three remaining teams, round robin format (A vs. B, A vs. C, B vs. C) with the top two teams playing again in the championship final (first tiebreaker if needed is number of votes, second is number of call-up players, third is OT re-voting).
I'd choose these four minor league drafted coaches over these four main league drafted coaches:
From Atd#7 Minor League Draft: Hitchcock, Tarasov, Reay, Quinn
From ATD#7 Main Draft: Keenan, Maurice, Nolan, Ruff
Of course, taking into account coaching styles is important. Keenan is a cancer long term and keeps getting fired, but his intense style is a short term fix. That damn game 7 3-2 win by the Rangers earns Keenan a place in history he doesn't deserve, over the four aforementioned minor league drafted coaches. And, while Nolan is a player's coach and gets the most from his boys, is he as good as Hitchcock or Reay? He, and Ruff, certainly haven't shown as much as some coaches who were available for the minor league draft. I'm a Nolan fan, but in an all-time context, he is still a few years away in terms of deserving recognition among the best (though I believe in his potential!).
At the very least, the 28-team main draft could be extended to 32 teams (one more per division) with no loss in coaching quality, eh?
Esposito could tank itIf I remember well, the goalies of the 7th seeds were Esposito, Vernon/Connell, Holocek and... Turk Broda.
sure, anytime thursday eastern timeIf you can wait til this evening VI, I will get mine in tonight. around 7 or so PST.