justafan22
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2014
- 11,629
- 6,249
He's rebounded enough that he won't be in Europe next year but will again be battling for a backup job somewhere.
It's a trap!
Losing Lindgren on waivers for Niemi is foolish.
That’s stated in the article. Clearly states that Niemi is at least making Bergevin think about offering him a extension and options to move Lindgren if he feels Niemi is the better option to back up price. Habs got a lot of goalie prospects. They can afford to move oneCharlie Lindgren is signed to 3 years 750 000 per one way contract .
Montreal Canadiens # 2 goalie is Charlie Lindgren .
You clearly didn’t read it. IF they resign Niemi, they can look to move Charlie. If that’s how they value Niemi. With the prospect pool the habs have, Niemi could sign for a year, 2 tops and then Mcniven could be ready for back up duties.
Montreal aren't trading LindgrenThat’s stated in the article. Clearly states that Niemi is at least making Bergevin think about offering him a extension and options to move Lindgren if he feels Niemi is the better option to back up price. Habs got a lot of goalie prospects. They can afford to move one
I understand where you’re coming from. We have a goalie locked up to be the starter for a long time and backup goalies are usually not difficult to fill, if not for cheap. But Niemi is going to be 35, a decade younger then Lindgren who is in a cost controlled for 3 years and won’t cause a log jam in our system?
Like I said through out the thread, I’m a big fan of Charlie. I love that they are spending less then 1m on a backup especially for 3 years. I’m very comfortable with Lindgren backing up Price. But with the way Niemi is playing, Bergevin at least has to think about it, especially if the right offer comes to him for Lindgren.