I believe you nailed it Mantis... quite possibly the only statement here that everyone can agree upon. Who do you guess might be joining the B:s, or prefer to join and to what cost?I think we need a winger
ESPN predicts Kreider for Bjork, 1st, and conditional pick
Hope not.
ESPN predicts Kreider for Bjork, 1st, and conditional pick
ESPN predicts Kreider for Bjork, 1st, and conditional pick
@Coach Parker mentioned (in the previous thread) keeping an eye on Vancouver owing to the Boeser trade rumors. But I am wondering why he would even be available.
@Coach Parker mentioned (in the previous thread) keeping an eye on Vancouver owing to the Boeser trade rumors. But I am wondering why he would even be available.
@Coach Parker mentioned (in the previous thread) keeping an eye on Vancouver owing to the Boeser trade rumors. But I am wondering why he would even be available.
ESPN predicts Kreider for Bjork, 1st, and conditional pick
ESPN predicts Kreider for Bjork, 1st, and conditional pick
i think they'd trade him if you're giving up mcavoy, or someone on that level.
I can live with this if the pick is if Kreider resigns with Boston, also still have to move Heinen in another deal. Would probably have to move Moore to have the cap space to make this move.ESPN predicts Kreider for Bjork, 1st, and conditional pick
@Coach Parker mentioned (in the previous thread) keeping an eye on Vancouver owing to the Boeser trade rumors. But I am wondering why he would even be available.
depends if you believe Bjork will develop into a great player. The late 1st is what the prices are at the deadline. I'd do it bc they need a RW
@Coach Parker mentioned (in the previous thread) keeping an eye on Vancouver owing to the Boeser trade rumors. But I am wondering why he would even be available.
Why does Bjork need to become a "star" to make it a bad trade?Why do people think Bjork is gonna magically turn into some star. I would be more worried about the condtional pick than Bjork.
We would need to add Toffoli or someone to replace him on the 3rd line though.
I would say Studnicka is a lot more promising than Bjork.Why does Bjork need to become a "star" to make it a bad trade?
Is Kreider a star? Guy is a 50 point player. At this point we don't know what Bjork is, but relatively speaking he certainly seems to be the most promising young forward we have in the entire system (excluding Pasta of course). We are going to give that player up, along with a 1st rounder, for a 50 point rental? Hell no.
Reasonable for sure, but I’d hate to break up Coyle-Bjork. They seem to be developing some major chemistry. I’d counter with 1st, Vak , conditional pick if Kreider re-signs. Or 1st, Khulman, Zboril. And NY would obviously have to retain 50%. Just don’t want to trade Bjork right now, might be something beautiful happening here.ESPN predicts Kreider for Bjork, 1st, and conditional pick
Khulman and Zboril do not have much trade valueReasonable for sure, but I’d hate to break up Coyle-Bjork. They seem to be developing some major chemistry. I’d counter with 1st, Vak , conditional pick if Kreider re-signs. Or 1st, Khulman, Zboril. And NY would obviously have to retain 50%. Just don’t want to trade Bjork right now, might be something beautiful happening here.