Proposal: All Bruins Rumours/Proposals 2020 IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

22Brad Park

Registered User
Nov 23, 2008
47,054
25,969
Calgary AB
You can be tired of hearing it, but its a fact and it made their way too the cup finals a whole lot easier and when your talking about adding players for a long playoff run for this year , you have to take that into consideration. That they'll more than likely have to go through at least one of those teams if not both.

If the bruins had to face the same foes as a year ago, I'd say they more than likely wouldn't have to add, but the odds of that happening again this year is slim to none, and Sweeney needs to address his line-up accordingly, because even though they have the second best record in the NHL, the playoffs are a whole new season.

Bruins need a bit of heaviness yup.But they can still beat them teams if they play the game right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

Five Hole

The puck stops here.
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2004
502
206
Southern New England
Boston always has trouble with Washington.

It doesn’t mean they couldn’t have beaten them but you just match up differently against certain teams

This is a sensible and accurate reply. The Capitols do indeed create a difficult match up for the Bruins, not impossible but difficult. Boston was fortunate that they did not have to go through the Capitols, not LUCKY but fortunate that they could avoid the heavy series.

As far as Tampa, they where nothing more then front runners and anyone claiming that avoiding them last year was lucky didn't watch the first round. They where a cream-puff team that gave Columbus a free pass to the second round.

What if that free pass went to the Bruins, what if Columbus had to go 7 games with Toronto? Imagine how quick that Blue Jackets Series would have been if Columbus had been beaten up by Toronto and the Bruins swept Tampa, would have been another sweep for the Bruins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BB88

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
40,946
20,596
For me Palmieri is the guy. G/GP that put him around 31 goals for 82 since 2017-2018. Just turned 29 a few days ago and has a year left on his deal. Right shot RW, which is what this team needs (not another LS RW). Wears the "A" for the Devils, so he's got leadership qualities.

The but question is is he a guy you want to re-sign in a year?

I’d like a more longterm option
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lo97 and wintersej

elMatador

Registered User
Feb 20, 2008
1,273
1,519
Did you see what Nylander said after loss to Florida ? NO WAY I WANT HIM NEAR BRUINS.Tim & Sid: Examining William Nylander's post-game comments after Panthers game - Sportsnet.ca

In all honesty it's not Nylander's fault that Leafs have no identity. That team has no structure. Last year they had no captain so of course no wonder they lost in the playoffs. There would be a quibble between themselves if they had won who should be the first guy to raise the Cup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck Smith

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,135
18,170
Connecticut
Just because Bruins will put Palmieri on the 2nd PP unit the Devils will not lower the price. That's my point.

This is a different point than you made previously by stating that Palmieri was a PP specialist and nothing special at ES.

Of course it would be nice to have a luxury of a prime PP guy if one of our top 3 gets injured.
Also playing with Krejci requires some grit and skill. Bit worried he might be similar to DeBrusk who is north south type and personally I think works better with Coyle.

I don't buy the grit & skill argument, but that's a different discussion that's not worth having.

If Palmieri were a premier player as you have pointed out he would have scored more than mid 50 points.

No where did I say premier player. Now while 50pts doesn't seem like a lot, its actually pretty good.

% of all forward to hit 50+ pts per season
18-19: 17%
17-18: 17%
16-17: 16%

Overall Coleman is not so flashy as Palmieri with his wrist shots but is more useful player.

Meh, we'll agree to disagree on this.[/quote][/quote]
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,118
20,933
Tyler, TX
The but question is is he a guy you want to re-sign in a year?

I’d like a more longterm option

That is the question- you could give up a lot, but then would be looking at a probably expensive contract and lengthy contract for a 30+ guy, not a road the Bruins need to travel any more. That said, if he was the player that pushes them over the top for this season and next while the forward core is still intact and solid (meaning Krejci and Bergeron I guess), it could be worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BB88

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,135
18,170
Connecticut
Kind of addressed this above, but what if he is looking for 5-6 years at $6mil or so (going off the seeming rates right now)- smells a little Backes-esque to me.

If the team can fit it then I'm all for it. I don't know where the Backes comp comes in. They play two completely different styles of hockey. Backes had 700+ games of a heavy two-way game before signing here at 32 years old.
 

finchster

Registered User
Jul 12, 2006
10,634
2,124
Antalya
Kind of addressed this above, but what if he is looking for 5-6 years at $6mil or so (going off the seeming rates right now)- smells a little Backes-esque to me.
I am not sure a player like Palmieri will decline as hard as Backes did, and I was against that deal before it happened, but it isn't a bet I would be willing to make.
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,118
20,933
Tyler, TX
I am not sure a player like Palmieri will decline as hard as Backes did, and I was against that deal before it happened, but it isn't a bet I would be willing to make.

If the team can fit it then I'm all for it. I don't know where the Backes comp comes in. They play two completely different styles of hockey. Backes had 700+ games of a heavy two-way game before signing here at 32 years old.

Not a style comp at all, an age comp. Palmieri might not decline like Backes, but the Bruins should be leery of it all the same. I am not saying I would be against it categorically, but it is worth thinking about.
 

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,135
18,170
Connecticut
Not a style comp at all, an age comp. Palmieri might not decline like Backes, but the Bruins should be leery of it all the same. I am not saying I would be against it categorically, but it is worth thinking about.

But wouldn't you have to consider the style? Backes plays a heavy hitting game and that takes a toll on your body over time. Palmieri doesn't play that type of game and in theory should help him sustain his play at an older age because he body isn't as banged up.
 

Shoebottom88

Registered User
Feb 4, 2019
588
846
Is Palmieri going to push down one of Pasta, Bergeron or Marchand from the first PP unit? If not than to pay a hefty price for a PP specialist only to use him for 35 to 40 seconds on PP is not a smart move.
Palmieri is heavily relying on his shot as the major asset. Scores a buttload of goals on PP, not denying that, however on ES he is not that special.
If I were Sweeney I would call the Devils, ask for Palmieri and settle for Coleman. Coleman has scored the equal number of goals as Palmieri this season. All of his goals were on ES or SH. Also he is a much better 2 way player who is versatile at both wings or at a center.
Coleman’s stats look great! Mostly even strength goals, hits, giveaways/takeaways. Looks like a guy who would get you those dirty greasy goals in the playoffs. Like your idea, start with Palmieri then move on to Coleman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Strafer

Shoebottom88

Registered User
Feb 4, 2019
588
846
Just because Bruins will put Palmieri on the 2nd PP unit the Devils will not lower the price. That's my point. Of course it would be nice to have a luxury of a prime PP guy if one of our top 3 gets injured.
Also playing with Krejci requires some grit and skill. Bit worried he might be similar to DeBrusk who is norht south type and personally I think works better with Coyle. If Palmieri were a premier player as you have pointed out he would have scored more than mid 50 points.
Overall Coleman is not so flashy as Palmieri with his wrist shots but is more useful player.
Just go for it and get them both. Coleman-Krejci-Palmieri
Debrusk-Coyle-Bjork

1st , Gryz, Heinen, Cehlarik
 

The Laukomotive

Registered User
Nov 26, 2017
946
1,297
Countdown to TradeCentre: Could the Florida Panthers make a 'hockey trade?' - TSN.ca

Florida Panthers general manager Dale Tallon announced his wish list ahead of the trade deadline in no uncertain terms on Tuesday.

"I'd like to acquire a veteran D if I could to play with (Aaron) Ekblad and settle things down a bit back there," Tallon told NHL.com. "We need to be more consistent on the blue line."

Ekblad is currently paired with Michael Matheson on the team's top duo, but Tallon said Matheson has had consistency issues throughout the season.

"(Riley) Stillman's been really good," he said. "Matheson has been good some nights, not so good other nights. We need to have less ups and downs back there."

(...)

TSN Hockey Insider Pierre LeBrun suggested Tuesday that the Panthers have been receiving calls on winger Mike Hoffman, adding the team may be willing to move the winger for defensive help.

If true, that's a RW for a LD trade waiting to happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad