50-60 points? once he settles?...50-60 points is **** !!!
So you basically saying, he is going to fail,he will never be
a goal scoring sniper in the NHL,nor point scoring power either.
His disadvanteges are actually going to his biggest
advantages,no one is going to take him seriously, especially
in his rookie season,small,puny,bad skater,what a joke,
thats what "they" gonna say.
His mind boggling high hockey IQ,awesome shot selection,
super easily finds great chemistry with whom ever he plays with.
-> McDavid,Strome,Maksimovich,Raddysh,Cirelli,Foegele,
before and after DeBrincat...looking at their
stats before playing with Alex and after...
crazy increase in stats,coincidence? i-don't-think-so.
I predict; eventually,in 2-3 years,he will be a 50 goal
100 point player.
50-60 points? once he settles?...50-60 points is **** !!!
So you basically saying, he is going to fail,he will never be
a goal scoring sniper in the NHL,nor point scoring power either.
His disadvanteges are actually going to his biggest
advantages,no one is going to take him seriously, especially
in his rookie season,small,puny,bad skater,what a joke,
thats what "they" gonna say.
His mind boggling high hockey IQ,awesome shot selection,
super easily finds great chemistry with whom ever he plays with.
-> McDavid,Strome,Maksimovich,Raddysh,Cirelli,Foegele,
before and after DeBrincat...looking at their
stats before playing with Alex and after...
crazy increase in stats,coincidence? i-don't-think-so.
I predict; eventually,in 2-3 years,he will be a 50 goal
100 point player.
My biggest concern is that the coaching staff will be idiots and make him 'earn' his way into the top 6 to play with talent, rather than immediately putting him into a position to make the most of his assets.
He's not a grinder. He will never be a grinder. And he should not have to play with grinders to prove himself 'worthy'. Put skill players in a position to use their skill. Immediately.
Take a lesson from the Penguins. Sheary and Guentzel were put in the top 6 almost immediately. Because that's the role their skill-sets are suited for.
A guy who regularly scores 50+ points is a damn good hockey player.
Good stuff from McDavid. He gives good answers to things. Actual thoughts, not just cliche-phrased, short answers.
If he gets 40 points next year with 20 goals I will be ecetatic about that, with the great players Stan is flushing down the toilet via garbage trades we need a minimum 3x20 goal scorer added to this team if it's going to go anywhere along with an elite D-man
And a second elite defenseman.
Call me crazy but I think a young D is something we can get via Panarin (who is dramatically underrated on here).
I am pretty sure that if Debrincat turned into a 100 point player BWC would get a Stanley Bowman face tatoo'd on his back like Steve-o from jackass did.
If he gets 40 points next year with 20 goals I will be ecetatic about that, with the great players Stan is flushing down the toilet via garbage trades we need a minimum 3x20 goal scorer added to this team if it's going to go anywhere along with an elite D-man
Back on topic: Hopefully McDavid's words are sincere and not token.
Call me crazy but I think a young D is something we can get via Panarin (who is dramatically underrated on here).
He's not underrated, he's a top ten O talent in the league. When it comes to the playoffs though he lays an egg.
Statistically, this claim is untrue. At least do some research. He was active against the Blues and the whole team sucked against the Preds so nice work trying to make an assumption off of that.
We can get a great defensemen with Panarin as a starting poknt at least.
Faulk
Slavin
Hanafin
Manson
Trouba
There sre a bunch of packages around Panarin that could get you those guys. The question is how mych are you willing to add on top.
Despite what some people think, I dont believe a scoring winger with only 2 cost-controlled years gets it done.