GDT: 2024 NHL trade deadline 3/8/24 3pm eastern time (Sell everything)
- Thread starter Mrfenn92
- Start date
- Status
BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 1,800
- 1,078
Nope I was wrong on the number of teams. The Markstrom fallout to Jersey and Ullmark to LA no trade clause may have thrown that off. Also Colorado wanting a goalie but not getting one.
Good return for Allen a conditional 3rd that turns into a second. Exactly what I said Mrazek could get that you to soo much offense to.
Hawkaholic
Registered User
He's signed for next year, Mrazek wasn't, so not really comparable. No way they get a potential 2nd if Allen isn't signed for next year.
clydesdale line
Connor BeJesus
- Jan 10, 2012
- 24,633
- 22,699
BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 1,800
- 1,078
I mean you can compare. You just don't want to because it makes you feel more right.
6 years of retention tho eeeek
Hawkaholic
Registered User
How? One is signed for next year, one was set to be a UFA. Guys who are signed are more valuable. You just can't admit that not a single UFA goalie was traded for a 2nd round pick, just like I said. And the goalie market wasn't any different than any other year, just like I said.
BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 1,800
- 1,078
Lol why are you still arguing on this? I was wrong on the number of teams that I thought would be in on a goalie. There was only 3 that we know of. Carolina had the situation fixed with Kochetkov stepping up. Toronto Colorado and Edmonton stood pat.
I still believe Mrazek could have gotten a 2nd or a 3rd if available. Sorry.
1.4 million per year retention for 6 more seasons probably is meaningless for the first 4 (if not more) seasons.
Hawkaholic
Registered User
You were so adamant that you were right while we are arguing before. You were wrong on everything you said, and others and myself, were right. Goalies don't return anything at the deadline in a trade, that's just how it is (unless its a top goalie)
BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 1,800
- 1,078
Are you not reading what I said? I said I was wrong on the number of teams. We have no idea what Mrazek could have gotten because he wasnt available. Why are upset? You were right about the number of teams going after a goalie. It was only New Jersey and LA.
Hawkaholic
Registered User
Upset? What are you talking about? lol
He wouldn't have got anything meaningful, no one is trading a 2nd or better for a back up/1B goalie, unless that goalie is a top goalie.
BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 1,800
- 1,078
Hawkaholic
Registered User
DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
Hawkaholic
Registered User
Probably the right call, considering the other team with lots of cap space won't have any available.
DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
Hattrick Kane
Registered User
- Oct 8, 2018
- 8,937
- 12,999
We also have 7 picks in the first three rounds this year. We don’t need more late round picks on top of that.
Hawkaholic
Registered User
Agreed. Could possibly get a 2nd or 3rd in the future since teams will be more limited on who they can get to retain.
clydesdale line
Connor BeJesus
- Jan 10, 2012
- 24,633
- 22,699
BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 1,800
- 1,078
Id love to see Markstrom to Colorado. Vegas vs Colorado playoff matchup.
Prob Rooney or Kylington tho.
Hawkaholic
Registered User
clydesdale line
Connor BeJesus
- Jan 10, 2012
- 24,633
- 22,699
Sharks going for the worst record and nobody is going to stop them.
ClydeLee
Registered User
- Mar 23, 2012
- 11,786
- 5,324
It's not ONLY multiple year deals that happened though. I take this as a mark. I get waiting hoping someone wanted Johnson or something, but he hey they still are down a mid pick they sent out in things like the Hagel trade.
Wah...wah.. exceptvfor Beauvillier for sone strange Nashville reason,nobody wanted any poart of the Hawks pending ufa players by tradibg an asset for them NOR did any trading team need Hawkscretentiom help..Sliw day for KD.
ChiHawks10
Registered User
Last edited:
- Status
