Its also how we got best player in the draft Mark Jankowski as opposed to
Girginson, Ceci, Wilson, Hertl, Teravainen, Vasilevski or Laughton all of whom are and were better with a couple that would actually have changed the franchise.
No... that was Weisbrod and Feaster being enamored by Jankowski and thinking they'd get him and another asset by trading down. They would have drafted Jankowski over those guys if they'd be worried someone might have taken him.
Conroy has gone on record about the tier system in the past. If they trade down, it's because they think they could get one of Hertl, Wilson, TT or Vasilevski all of which are BPA at that tier and they're happy with either. Trading down on Zary I think it was either because they knew no one else in that range was looking at Zary, or they were good with either Zary or Lapierre and kept going down and taking free assets because they knew certain teams were doing BPA dman on that same tier vs Flames were doing BPA C.
I trust scouting under Treliving and now I'm optimistic on Conroy. I do not trust scouting under Sutter, Feaster (it was 50:50) or Burke/Sutter influenced drafts. Luckily, I do not think that is the case for this upcoming draft.
I also hope Conroy lifts the weird Calgary boy drafting ethos that was apparent in the Burke/Sutter influenced drafts so that we don't end up missing out on the Point and Stankoven options in the 2nd and 3rd rounds.
@Tkachuk Norris might be elated if this happens.