I can't overstate how utterly stupid I find the vast majority of playoff narratives in football and most of every sport as well.
We're dealing with tiny sample sizes over vast periods of time with constantly changing factors. Give me a Dak Prescott (or Tony Romo before him) or Lamar or Kirk Cousins or Joe Thornton or or or any high-performing player over big sample sizes (like multiple regular seasons) and I'll keep trying to win with them unless there's genuinely something mental that's a concern. Those guys are rare enough to begin with.
The truth is Lamar Jackson had an uneven game and that short of him dicing up teams like he has for the past month at the tune of 4-5 touchdowns a game was always going to bring idiots (not meaning you) out of the woodwork. These guys aren't playing a different sport in the playoffs. If you think there's a common plan to beating Lamar in the playoffs, you'd see it applied in the regular season. People are just stupidly buying into preconceived narratives. Zay Flowers doesn't fumble at the 1 and it's a 3 point game and then it's a ball game. Things change fast.
It's exactly why we saw
@WeThreeKings talk crap before the Houston game. Then go quiet when Lamar went off. And then come back when this game was over. Because God forbid you don't actually hedge your bet.