2022 University Cup

Drummer

Better Red than Dead
Mar 20, 2009
1,694
187
Freddy Beach, NB
www.vredshockey.com
When do teams start arriving…today?

If I recall Kelly Nobe's comment, in Freddy, about Queen's getting stuck on the road (he basically threw them under the bus) - 'We all know, if you play on Thursday - you arrive on Monday, if you play on Friday - you arrive on Tuesday'. His take was - arrive on Monday, get acclimatized on Tuesday, practice on Wednesday, play on Thursday. It also gives you Tuesday to deal with any logistics issues.

So - I would suspect that 2 teams are in town already and the rest arrive today.
 

Hollywood3

Bison/Jet/Moose Fan
May 12, 2007
6,471
974
But doesn’t it make more sense to keep each side of the bracket in the same time slot on Thurs/Fri/Sat…rather than some teams having to jump between afternoon/night games or vice versa? As I mentioned, that was how the old six team format was set-up with afternoon/evening pools and it seemed to work well.
Not remotely sensible. Under the 6 team format one team was always playing back-to-back while their opponent had a day off.
 

AUS Fan

Registered User
Aug 1, 2008
4,019
1,760
At the Rink
Not remotely sensible. Under the 6 team format one team was always playing back-to-back while their opponent had a day off.
Yup. Under the old system the Thursday loser played on Friday (their 2nd game) and then the Friday teams played the Thursday winners on Saturday. So 4 teams played back-to-back and at times a team OR 2 played 3 in a row.

Then the committee did win-loss records, head-to-head, +/-, number of left hand shots, height & weight of the teams to determine who was gonna play on Sunday.

Many times I've sat in the media room while the pundits and sometimes AD's went thru the different scenarios of how a team could advance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drummer

UNB Bruins Fan

Registered User
Mar 11, 2008
14,070
1,633
Fredericton, NB
Not remotely sensible. Under the 6 team format one team was always playing back-to-back while their opponent had a day off.
But at least there was a strong possibility of the two teams in the final playing on similar rest. That’s impossible with this format…you’re always going to have a team in the final playing 3 in 3 vs. a team playing 3 in 4. In fact, using this years schedule, you may have a team play 3 games between 1PM Thursday and 7:30PM Sunday (78.5 hours) vs. a team that plays 3 games between 7PM Friday and 7:30PM Sunday (48.5 hours)…I have never played high level sports so I may be way off here, but to me that seems like a huge advantage for the team that advances out of the Thursday pool.

I guess I just don’t like the fact that one of the top two teams is always getting shafted in terms of rest with this format. I think they should have as similar schedules as possible.
 

UNB Bruins Fan

Registered User
Mar 11, 2008
14,070
1,633
Fredericton, NB
Went back and looked…in the five tournaments played under the current format, the winner has actually come out of the Friday bracket four times (15/16/18/19)…the only exception was UNB in 2017.

So what do I know?? Maybe the extra rest isn’t as big of deal as I thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drummer and AUS Fan

AUS Fan

Registered User
Aug 1, 2008
4,019
1,760
At the Rink
Went back and looked…in the five tournaments played under the current format, the winner has actually come out of the Friday bracket four times (15/16/18/19)…the only exception was UNB in 2017.

So what do I know?? Maybe the extra rest isn’t as big of deal as I thought.
I was gonna do that. Thanks.
 

AUS Fan

Registered User
Aug 1, 2008
4,019
1,760
At the Rink
Brock team on Citadel Hill today. Guessing they skated at Metro Center.
brock.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob

Aces89

Registered User
Apr 22, 2020
167
79
Ryerson/UNB will be interesting. Ryerson is a big, mean team who plays a heavy game. I think UNB is the -300 favourites to win but wouldn't be shocked if Ryerson wins.
 

AUS Fan

Registered User
Aug 1, 2008
4,019
1,760
At the Rink
Ryerson/UNB will be interesting. Ryerson is a big, mean team who plays a heavy game. I think UNB is the -300 favourites to win but wouldn't be shocked if Ryerson wins.
It'll depend on how the game is called. The refs normally don't like "big, mean teams".

UNB is a skill team and skilled players don't like to get hit.
 

AdamMcg83

Registered User
Oct 12, 2011
568
131
www.twitter.com
If I recall Kelly Nobe's comment, in Freddy, about Queen's getting stuck on the road (he basically threw them under the bus) - 'We all know, if you play on Thursday - you arrive on Monday, if you play on Friday - you arrive on Tuesday'. His take was - arrive on Monday, get acclimatized on Tuesday, practice on Wednesday, play on Thursday. It also gives you Tuesday to deal with any logistics issues.

So - I would suspect that 2 teams are in town already and the rest arrive today.
Would never want to disrespect the memory of the great Kelly Nobes, but it's worthwhile pointing out that he coached a program with some of the deepest pockets in the country. Travel is a huge expense, and one fewer night in a hotel could be very appealing for a lot of programs.
 

Drummer

Better Red than Dead
Mar 20, 2009
1,694
187
Freddy Beach, NB
www.vredshockey.com
Would never want to disrespect the memory of the great Kelly Nobes, but it's worthwhile pointing out that he coached a program with some of the deepest pockets in the country. Travel is a huge expense, and one fewer night in a hotel could be very appealing for a lot of programs.
Yes, but Queen's decision to save one night cost them any chance of winning game 1 on Thursday night having arrived that afternoon (due to the weather delay) - they even started the game late to give them an extra hour.
 

Drummer

Better Red than Dead
Mar 20, 2009
1,694
187
Freddy Beach, NB
www.vredshockey.com
... Then the committee did win-loss records, head-to-head, +/-, number of left hand shots, height & weight of the teams to determine who was gonna play on Sunday.

Many times I've sat in the media room while the pundits and sometimes AD's went thru the different scenarios of how a team could advance.
Good times - lots of fun. I've built a number of UCup specific spreadsheets to calculate tie-breakers.

The best scenario was the USask/McGill game in 2012 on Saturday night. A 1 or 2 goal loss (in regulation or in OT) guaranteed McGill a mathematical advancement regardless (a win and they were 2-0, a loss and all three teams were 1-1 and McGill won on GF/GA), so the ADs and USPORTs guys really didn't like the optics of the losing team advancing - the optics were worse if the game went to OT. USask scored with 5min left and McGill advanced, but it was easier to swallow than going to OT.

I recall Foil explaining it to UNB's AD that McGill could literally tank in OT and give USask a free breakaway to end the game and advance.

I believe this game, and the possible OT outcome, was the biggest motivator for the 8-team format.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FreddyFoyle

AdamMcg83

Registered User
Oct 12, 2011
568
131
www.twitter.com
Yes, but Queen's decision to save one night cost them any chance of winning game 1 on Thursday night having arrived that afternoon (due to the weather delay) - they even started the game late to give them an extra hour.
I'm sure Brett Gibson would have loved to fly, and/or arrive three days before the game. But it's also hard to anticipate a snowstorm so impactful that it halts traffic for an entire 24-hour span. It's just not realistic to assume that every athletic department has the resources to arrive several days early.
 

AUS Fan

Registered User
Aug 1, 2008
4,019
1,760
At the Rink
Good times - lots of fun. I've built a number of UCup specific spreadsheets to calculate tie-breakers.

The best scenario was the USask/McGill game in 2012 on Saturday night. A 1 or 2 goal loss (in regulation or in OT) guaranteed McGill a mathematical advancement regardless (a win and they were 2-0, a loss and all three teams were 1-1 and McGill won on GF/GA), so the ADs and USPORTs guys really didn't like the optics of the losing team advancing - the optics were worse if the game went to OT. USask scored with 5min left and McGill advanced, but it was easier to swallow than going to OT.

I recall Foil explaining it to UNB's AD that McGill could literally tank in OT and give USask a free breakaway to end the game and advance.

I believe this game and the possible OT outcome was the biggest motivator for the 8-team format.
I recall that game and the discussion around it.

In 2009 Thunder Bay, SMU was +3 going into the their game with UWO who were -1.
I was joking with Shelia-Ann Newton from CIS that we were gonna forfeit the game.
She called Stieny and asked him if it was true. In hindsight I wish we had done that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drummer

jdan1997

Registered User
Aug 22, 2012
284
1
Admittedly, I didn't see much of Ryerson this year, but I definitely wouldn't have classified them as a big, mean team.
I’d have to agree with this. They seemed to be the less physical team throughout most of the playoffs in my opinion. It seemed like they were playing with some injuries though so maybe that factored in. I think it’ll be the same against UNB with Cramarossa and potentially Addison being injured - They won’t want an even shorter bench.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdamMcg83

AdamMcg83

Registered User
Oct 12, 2011
568
131
www.twitter.com
On paper, Ryerson has as much or more high-end talent than any recent OUA West participant in the UCup. Since their program's resurgence here in the past 6-ish years, they have been able to consistently recruit top-end players. There have been two major rubs on them though: they haven't been able to build continuity (they consistently lose more undergrads than just about anyone), and they haven't been particularly difficult to play against.
However, they are now one of the oldest teams in the country (14 graduating players), and they've finally overcome some adversity and shown some grit (two third-period comebacks in the playoffs).
I wouldn't say they play a mean or heavy style. But they have a weird kind of calm to them recently, and they have some high-end talent (50-60 pt major junior guys) that is rare for OUA West teams, specifically. They aren't a favourite against UNB, by any means, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were a harder out than anticipated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdan1997

RED ARMY EAST

Registered User
Feb 14, 2010
1,932
286
Freddy Beach,N.B.Canada
On paper, Ryerson has as much or more high-end talent than any recent OUA West participant in the UCup. Since their program's resurgence here in the past 6-ish years, they have been able to consistently recruit top-end players. There have been two major rubs on them though: they haven't been able to build continuity (they consistently lose more undergrads than just about anyone), and they haven't been particularly difficult to play against.
However, they are now one of the oldest teams in the country (14 graduating players), and they've finally overcome some adversity and shown some grit (two third-period comebacks in the playoffs).
I wouldn't say they play a mean or heavy style. But they have a weird kind of calm to them recently, and they have some high-end talent (50-60 pt major junior guys) that is rare for OUA West teams, specifically. They aren't a favourite against UNB, by any means, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were a harder out than anticipated.
I’d have to agree with this. They seemed to be the less physical team throughout most of the playoffs in my opinion. It seemed like they were playing with some injuries though so maybe that factored in. I think it’ll be the same against UNB with Cramarossa and potentially Addison being injured - They won’t want an even shorter bench.
Ryerson/UNB will be interesting. Ryerson is a big, mean team who plays a heavy game. I think UNB is the -300 favourites to win but wouldn't be shocked if Ryerson wins.
UNB, also went 24-3 in AUS play.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad