Yes and got the Dunkley pick aswellMoved back to take Sandin?
Yes and got the Dunkley pick aswellMoved back to take Sandin?
Nice job.Just finished an interactive mock as the Leafs on the mock draft board. How did I do?
Picks:
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Round Pick Player Position Team 2 35 Rasmus Sandin LHD Sault Ste. Marie (OHL) 2 53 Bulat Shafigullin LW Nizhnekamsk (KHL) 3 66 Nathan Dunkley C London (OHL) 3 84 Vladislav Kotkov RW Chicoutimi (QMJHL) 4 119 Yegor Sharangovich C Minsk (KHL) 4 120 Caleb Everett RHD Saginaw (OHL) 5 145 Pavel Gogolev RW Peterborough (OHL) 7 203 Owen Lalonde RHD Guelph (OHL) 7 206 Nikolai Kovalenko RW Yaroslavl (MHL) 7 213 Billy Moskal C London (OHL)
Nice job.
In particular I love your 4th round, Moskal in the 7th and Dunkley @ 66. I really like the idea of trading back but I think that 66 for 10 spots is letting them off pretty light.
Took a look at the full mock and I'd definitely do the top 60 differently though. @ 35 would be between Samuelsson, Hallander, Wise. @ 53 I'd cartwheel to the podium to take Wise, he's a 1st round talent
Nice job.
In particular I love your 4th round, Moskal in the 7th and Dunkley @ 66. I really like the idea of trading back but I think that 66 for 10 spots is letting them off pretty light.
Took a look at the full mock and I'd definitely do the top 60 differently though. @ 35 would be between Samuelsson, Hallander, Wise. @ 53 I'd cartwheel to the podium to take Wise, he's a 1st round talent
I was 50/50 on Sandin/Samuelsson, would've been fine either way. I see that Wise would've been an excellent pick at 53, but I think Shafigullin was an underrated pick. He is destroying the MHL.I'd take Sandin probably at 35. That's a good spot for him. Wise at 53 easily. Dunkley in the 3rd is pretty good. Sharangovich and Everett in the 4th is pretty good. I'd have to see who else is around but I would consider others over Kotkov, likely a defenseman. Gogolev in the 5th is okay, but once again I'd see who else is around. Good with the 7th rounders, although would need due-diligence on Lalonde. He has baggage after demanding out of Sudbury, but it is a poorly run club so I can see why he would want out. Also have to question whether his skills will really match up despite being a 2nd overall OHL pick.
I was 50/50 on Sandin/Samuelsson, would've been fine either way. I see that Wise would've been an excellent pick at 53, but I think Shafigullin was an underrated pick. He is destroying the MHL.
I would take Dellandrea C at 35.Agree with this, Wise at 53 is a steal. Would also go with Samuelsson at 35, didn't look at the mock though.
Dunkley, Yegor, Moskal are nice picks in those slots.
Just judging on where they are slotted
He has high-end smarts and can read the play extremely well. He looks to be a top 4 shut-down guy who could easily compliment Liljegren. Greenway was a pure project who didn't excel at anything outside of having good raw tools.What makes Samuelsson so good... At least in comparison to Greenway who had similar type production in his draft year + is about the same size.
He has high-end smarts and can read the play extremely well. He looks to be a top 4 shut-down guy who could easily compliment Liljegren. Greenway was a pure project who didn't excel at anything outside of having good raw tools.
agree with that - add some depth at Center, then swing for the fences as often as possible at other positions. It's going to be forever until all of Korshkov/Grundstrom/Brooks/Bracco/etc get a real look even if they're all deserving of one, if we could add a star forward at the expense of a higher draft success rate that would make us hard to deal with. Bracco's probably the only guy left who isn't on the roster with any star powerI would take Dellandrea C at 35.
We really need to build up our center prospect depth.
Would be ecstatic with
Dellandrea
Dunkley
Moskal
I've seen every type of player drafted in the 20's turn into nothing. His upside is Ekholm. The chance of a player drafted in the 25-31 range becoming a core piece of value is like 35 percent.Sounds like his upside is a Chris Tanev type defenceman and his floor is likely an AHL defenceman.
I've seen too many "shut down" guys get drafted and turn into nothing.
I've seen every type of player drafted in the 20's turn into nothing. His upside is Ekholm. The chance of a player drafted in the 25-31 range becoming a core piece of value is like 35 percent.
His production is fine considering how the USNTDP use him. He's not a guy you draft in the top 10 anymore (which he may have gone in previous years) but in the late 20's he's a good pick.
The reason he's not putting up points is because the USNTDP coach is lost in how he's allocating PP time. Emberson and Adam Samuelson should never be playing over Miller on the PP, but they constantly do.What do you think of Miller?
I've seen some interesting stuff in his thread, there seems to be a feeling that he's got great tools, he's playing strong defensively beside a lot of offense first partners and thats one of the reasons he's not piling on the points but the offensive upside is there
Sounds like his upside is a Chris Tanev type defenceman and his floor is likely an AHL defenceman.
I've seen too many "shut down" guys get drafted and turn into nothing.
I've accepted the fact that Lundqvist won't be there for our second rounder unfortunately. I wouldn't hate reaching for him in the 1st, he's rising fast it seems.To Detroit:
25th OA
To TOR:
OTT 2nd
DET 2nd
OTT 2nd: C - Jack McBain
DET 2nd: C/LW - Jakub Lauko
SJS 2nd: RD - Nils Lundkvist
SJS 3rd: C - Dmitri Zavgorodnyi
STL 4th: RD - Vladislav Syomin (OA)
TOR 5th: G - Joel Hofer
ANA 7th: C Austin Wong
TOR 7th: RW Justin Brazeau OA
Just paste the YouTube url and the software embeds itI've literally regressed to not knowing how to upload a YT video anymore