CanadianHawks
Registered User
- Feb 23, 2018
- 1,491
- 1,286
Wouldn’t mind it, but what’s the cost?
He's been a scratch recently for the Devils. Maybe a Murphy for Severson deal. I like Murphy but a change of scenery may work for both sides
Wouldn’t mind it, but what’s the cost?
He's been a scratch recently for the Devils. Maybe a Murphy for Severson deal. I like Murphy but a change of scenery may work for both sides
Severson has had a down year and while I don't have the time to check it (I have time for posting obviously), I think he has played less in PP than last year.
Murphy for Severson any day of the week. I would add if necessarily. Not much but like 3rd?
Hammer is done ... injuries and age have taken a tollBring back Hammer and TVR.
Re sign Panarin in a year.
TvR would probably have been our 3rd or 4th best D this year.Hammer is done ... injuries and age have taken a toll
TVR is a never was .... he is a 5th 6th dman at best .... we have Seabrook and others to fill that role
Pannarin can be had when he is a UFA for $8-10 mil per year ... no way
No thanks on Kruger ... a 4th liner doesnt make this a playoff team
stop bringing back ex hawks
my 2 pennies
Bring back Hammer and TVR.
Re sign Panarin in a year.
Hammer is done. He has nothing left in the tank as far as I can tell.
TVR is a solid bottom pairing guy. Always has been. No reason to bring him back when the Hawks have quite a few third pairing guys already.
Panarin isn't getting resigned when it will cost the Hawks 8x9m or so. Just not happening. I'd rather do Tavares for that money at that point.
TVR... lol
Hammer is done. He has nothing left in the tank as far as I can tell.
TVR is a solid bottom pairing guy. Always has been. No reason to bring him back when the Hawks have quite a few third pairing guys already.
Panarin isn't getting resigned when it will cost the Hawks 8x9m or so. Just not happening. I'd rather do Tavares for that money at that point.
Hammer is done ... injuries and age have taken a toll
TVR is a never was .... he is a 5th 6th dman at best .... we have Seabrook and others to fill that role
Pannarin can be had when he is a UFA for $8-10 mil per year ... no way
No thanks on Kruger ... a 4th liner doesnt make this a playoff team
stop bringing back ex hawks
my 2 pennies
not sure anyone wanted to move him. i felt that trade was kind of a suprise to most.Panarin has chemestry with Kane. I think the hawks need depth imo and people familiar with the system. Had no idea so many wanted to move on.
If guys familiar with the system was the answer, Then Saad and Toews would have looked more like a 1st line and less like a 3rd line this year.Panarin has chemestry with Kane. I think the hawks need depth imo and people familiar with the system. Had no idea so many wanted to move on.
I agree to an extent. Our roster, primarily the defense and goaltending depth, played a big role in our performance this season, but better systems and structure would've helped a hell of a lot.Watching the playoffs for a week now and the Hawks problem, IMO, is not the who it's the how they play.
These teams play with much more pace, snarl and desire with quick counterattacks.
Unless we change the how (Q), it won't matter much about the who.
The hallmark of the Hawks Cup teams. First year in past ten they never once played like that, this year.Watching the playoffs for a week now and the Hawks problem, IMO, is not the who it's the how they play.
These teams play with much more pace, snarl and desire with quick counterattacks.
Unless we change the how (Q), it won't matter much about the who.