ChiHawks10
Registered User
I don't think they win 4 straight but we have seen some amazing things in Chicago Sports. One game at a time.
I don't think they win 4 straight but we have seen some amazing things in Chicago Sports. One game at a time.
Who the hell am I kidding, Q will ice Oduya, and he'll make a defensive mistake costing us game 4.
I don't think they win 4 straight but we have seen some amazing things in Chicago Sports. One game at a time.
Can't embed Hedger's tweet on mobile right now, but Kempny's finally in, taking Oduya's spot.
Lines are
8-19-81
72-15-88
70-16-14
38-67-22
Well, he's gotta change something.Yeah, throw a rookie who hasn't played for how long into the playoffs elimination game(s). Genius, Quenneville.
Can't embed Hedger's tweet on mobile right now, but Kempny's finally in, taking Oduya's spot.
Lines are
8-19-81
72-15-88
70-16-14
38-67-22
Q blew it by not playing Kempny more. It's a little late now, dude hasn't played in idk how many games where our actual whole roster was playing,
I like the roster change, hate the timing.
Everybody knew that Kempny would be back when the hole was dug. It's just inevitable that the optimal lineup is iced when the deficit is daunting. Hawks will rip off some wins but the margin of error is so small that they will likely fall short. Just like last year.
Is there some African curse I am unaware of that prevents Kane and Toews to be on a line together? I mean, we are down 3-0, at this point might as well put it all out there and see what happens. Anisimov isn't giving Kane any real help right now, might as well try and spark Toews with Kaner on his wing...I dunno, they can play on the power play together but never one a regular shift.
Is there some African curse I am unaware of that prevents Kane and Toews to be on a line together? I mean, we are down 3-0, at this point might as well put it all out there and see what happens. Anisimov isn't giving Kane any real help right now, might as well try and spark Toews with Kaner on his wing...I dunno, they can play on the power play together but never one a regular shift.
I thought for sure it would be Forsling.(actually TBH the thought remains in my mind)
I like MK's game. Always have. But he needed badly to play all season long. Q is really placing him in a difficult spot and I hope he succeeds.
But I don't know how any Hawk fan can stick up for Q this time.
Well they played together for about 10 games this year and were downright terrible together.
That usually is the nuclear option though with Q when they get down in the series. I think if they would have been down early in game 3 we would have seen it. Just as I expect we will see it in game 4 if they need offense. Since the PAK line has been dreadful in this series I kind of hope that they just go for it from the opening faceoff. Panarin-Anisimov-Hossa clicked earlier this year, maybe they can recapture a little of that now. The Kruger line was the only good line last game so keeping them together makes sense.
8-19-88
72-15-81
70-16-14
Panarin did lay down to block a point shot with his body in Game 2. And he was the most feisty of the forwards on ice, when there was a little scrum in front of Crawford and the two d-men, with #88 being the second-most feisty. I will let you guess who's the least engaged forward.
Same ****, different day, with the roster management.
At least Kempny is in the lineup like we've wanted since the beginning. Unfortunately, it's likely too little, too late.
Hopefully I'm wrong.