kelsier
Registered User
- Aug 17, 2013
- 4,280
- 1,741
Heiskanen and Makar play on good teams and have proper supporting structures in place. With NJ playing as badly as they have and with their defensive system being heavily criticized by many of those who watch the team, it's hard to say how the two defenders would look if they switched places with Hischier. They are both wonderfully talented players, but they aren't "Hynes" kind of players. Neither are physical and both would be hung out to dry by the system game after game.
Go watch Hischier in the World Championships. When the shackles are off he's much better than he can show now where he is being asked to play a defensive role many nights. NJ played PIT recently and had to defend a late game one goal lead. With Zajac on the bench, they roll Hischier out for the d zone draw against Malkin. Watch NJ play and watch the centers constantly over play defensively.
Put Hischier on COL and I'm guessing he's doing much better from an offensive standpoint. I don't see Hischier ever having the offense of Petterson but until you show me the defenders on the NJ dumpster fire team it's hard to really evaluate their play in a similar context to Hischier.
Just my thoughts. All of the top four and wonderful in their own way and I'm guessing each fan base is happy with the player they have which is the most important element to me.
I've heard this "good team vs bad team" argument so many times before it's not even funny. Did Pettersson have huge support and superb team last year? Well lets see, Vancouver finished 23th, being one the worst teams in the entire league. Did it stop Elias from scoring on a near PPG rate in his rookie year? Nope. In fact he made his team better, much better and without him they'd have done even worse. Perhaps, just perhaps if Hischier had a similar impact then New Jersey might not be a bottom dweller right now (it's not like the team has zero talent).
There are plenty of players who've done well in the World Championships, but haven't brought that game in the small rink. I don't see the significance to the argument why that would place him on the same tier with Pettersson, Heiskanen and Makar. Perhaps he develops in a different pace and eventually catches up, but that's a whole another story. As of today those three are the ones that would be going in the top 3 (in no particular order). We'll have plenty of time to see if that order changes in the future.