This model doesn't really rate defensive ability and skews heavily towards offensive ability so it's not surprising that he doesn't show well.
I believe in the other model he sits near the top of their dmen.
This model doesn't really rate defensive ability and skews heavily towards offensive ability so it's not surprising that he doesn't show well.
I believe in the other model he sits near the top of their dmen.
Oh yeah, defensive defensemen do not seem to do well at all in this metric...but Powder88 asked about him and I saw the Buffalo chart. Hopefully he can handle the role he's given here and bounces back.
Yikes. Seems like we didn't deserve to win that one.
Opponent | Quality Above Expected Corsi |
Leafs | -3.71 |
Flames | -11.32 |
Oilers | 2.18 |
Canucks | -3.72 |
Hurricanes | -7.47 |
Is another one leaving the public realm?
Is another one leaving the public realm?
Is another one leaving the public realm?
Just wondering if anyone has some info on actual zone time and how it relates or doesn't to improved scoring chances and/or shot location.
I know zone time has generally been disregarded but I had heard something about it when the pens were getting out corsid every game.
I've heard PoMo talk about it too.
Just curious if there is any new research that teams are purposefuly putting less pucks at the net in favor of better chances.
IIRC Maurice was talking about last season when he said we were a top 5 team in Ozone time.
The problem with this is we don't know exactly how they define zone time. Is it only with clear possession? Or strictly where the puck is. There could be a lot of variance and subjectivity on these kind of stats if it's the former.
But on that note, this is from this weeks 31 thoughts
30. Do not be surprised if the NHL fiddles around with more player tracking at All-Star. Hearing a German company — Jogmo — is making a pitch. There have also been rumours of the NHL talking to Second Spectrum, an interesting organization that does data/visual work for the NBA, among others. But I can’t pin that one down.
PoMo has talked about it in some individual game PC too.
I remember in the playoffs one of the 1290 shows had I believe Cullen on and he was talking specifically about how the Pens were getting out shot attempted and sometimes severely but they were creating better offensive chances with a lot of Ozone time and not just putting pucks to the net.
Was wondering if there is anything about this anywhere.
As it relates to the Jets, I've found the top 2 lines (and chefs line specifically) often look like they are passing up decent shooting opportunities in favor of trying to make plays for even better if more risky options.
Wondering if there is anything to this.
As well the Mike Kelly (I believe) video/report on how mark scheifele has been shooting less but more often from the slot has piqued my interest in this.
While I can't tell you who the Jets use or might use specifically, I can link you to a company whose name I've begun hearing being thrown around a lot more.Yost wrote a very interesting piece about private vs public analytics. This snippet is the part that intrigued me. The Jets most certainly are contracting someone. But are they contracting someone for data? Or for analysis? Or both?
Yost wrote a very interesting piece about private vs public analytics. This snippet is the part that intrigued me. The Jets most certainly are contracting someone. But are they contracting someone for data? Or for analysis? Or both?
Just wondering if anyone has some info on actual zone time and how it relates or doesn't to improved scoring chances and/or shot location.
I know zone time has generally been disregarded but I had heard something about it when the pens were getting out corsid every game.
I've heard PoMo talk about it too.
Just curious if there is any new research that teams are purposefuly putting less pucks at the net in favor of better chances.