I just noticed that Derek Grant has scored 0 goals in the NHL. That's almost impressive.
210 goals outside of the NHL
0 in it.
Wow!
Someone made a comment on facebook that Grant scored twice the past season, but both times it was deemed offside
I just noticed that Derek Grant has scored 0 goals in the NHL. That's almost impressive.
210 goals outside of the NHL
0 in it.
Wow!
Someone made a comment on facebook that Grant scored twice the past season, but both times it was deemed offside
I don't see there being a reasonable deal for Bozak. Don't get me wrong, I think he'd the perfect acquisition for our situation, but I just don't see them trading him for as long as they're in the playoff race.
As irritating as their fanbase is, I believe there's some truth to JVR being on the trade block. If they're ever going to pull a "Bobby Ryan" and get value for him, this would be the time to do it. The thought of JVR (or his eventual return) returning a top-4 defenseman is just ridiculous though.
So as of right now, I think we have an idea of what this team will look like next season.
To start the year:
Ritchie-Getzlaf-Eaves
Jones(9 games)-Rakell-Silfverberg
Kase-Steel(9 games)-Perry
Cogliano-Vermette-Wagner
Fowler-Montour
Larsson-Manson
Megna-Bieksa
Holzer
Team America Goalies
After the gang is healthy:
Rakell-Getzlaf-Eaves
Cogliano-Kesler-Silfverberg
Ritchie-Vermette-Perry
Kase-Grant-Wagner
Fowler-Manson
Lindholm-Montour
Larsson-Bieksa
Holzer
Team America Goalies.
Honestly, I like the first forward group better.
So as of right now, I think we have an idea of what this team will look like next season.
To start the year:
Ritchie-Getzlaf-Eaves
Jones(9 games)-Rakell-Silfverberg
Kase-Steel(9 games)-Perry
Cogliano-Vermette-Wagner
Fowler-Montour
Larsson-Manson
Megna-Bieksa
Holzer
Team America Goalies
After the gang is healthy:
Rakell-Getzlaf-Eaves
Cogliano-Kesler-Silfverberg
Ritchie-Vermette-Perry
Kase-Grant-Wagner
Fowler-Manson
Lindholm-Montour
Larsson-Bieksa
Holzer
Team America Goalies.
Honestly, I like the first forward group better.
The first lineup is based on the assumption that Jones and Steel are actual NHL players right now.
What happens if they both come to camp and dont cut it?
Ducks are in trouble at that point.
Jones and Steel won't get 9 games unless they are good enough to be last cuts at camp. If they aren't showing much, then you're going to see guys like Tropp and Kerdiles in there, which IMO, is just as likely.
Murray absolutely should not be done improving this team. As of now, I'd say we are worse than the team that finished last season. Yes, we could see some improvement from a few players, but I could see some regression from a few as well.
I guess Vermette or Rakell is going to be the 3C next season. I'm not overly excited about that.
Why would that be like Toronto fans? Henrique is a good player, but doesn't have the value of Vatanen. Zacha would be the main piece coming back and there would likely need to be more.
I'm not trying to stir the pot here, but what exactly do the posters on this forum think he is worth? Vatanen is a 2nd pairing RHD puckmover with a good shot, and can play PP and PK. There is a lot of value there for sure. However, he is also undersized, has never played a full 82 game season and won't this year, has never broken the 40 point mark, and costs nearly 5 million dollars AAV.
Now, I love Finnish players and I am a big fan of Vats and am hoping be becomes a force in this league. I am not at all unhappy with the prospect of him being with us long term. I just don't see a huge market for him due to his position (only a few teams rumored to be looking for a RHD), his salary (a lot of teams would have to swap salary with us to fit him comfortably under their cap which limits who we could get, and his injury history. And for this last point...yes I understand that he is only missing a month or two to start this season and he is signed for 3 years so no team should balk at a deal because he is currently injured. What I mean is that he appears to have durability issues and you have to consider that as having an effect on his trade value at least a bit.
How much higher would people rate Vatanen over, say, Jason Demers who is also rumored to be on the block? Why would a team looking for a Righty puck moving defenseman pay a huge asset or overpayment for Vatanen when they could probably get Demers for a song right now (assuming he'd waive of course)?
Again, not trying to stir things up. I am geniunly interested in what value people on here are expecting to get for Vats assuming he is traded.
No, thanks. Vatanen > Henrique. 2nd/3rd > Lovejoy.
Why would anyone want Demers over Vatanen? He's not significantly cheaper (~300K) and has been generally significantly less productive, especially on the PP. At 29, he's 3 years older and signed an extra year. He's nearing the end of his prime and won't be expected to be much more productive, whereas Vatanen is just entering his prime years and already has 2 years better than Demers' career year of 34 five seasons ago (he hasn't cracked 30 any other year). Teams will pay for scoring potential on a player who can be reasonably expected to improve.
I have no idea what the D market is. I'd expect either a similarly aged legitimate top 6 player with the same potential to improve as Vatanen, or a 1st plus a young player/prospect with the potential to become a legitimate top 6 player (not a cast-off D-lister that certain Canadian fan bases want to give up, a legitimate prospect).
All your points are valid, but Vancouver was just recently rumored as having a deal for Demers that Demers nixed. There's one team I can think of off the top of my head that was trying to get him. Reason being he would likely be traded for far less than what Vatanen is supposed to bring in return, so a team looking for a RD who can move the puck may prefer to give less and have a player who is not quite as good, as opposed to giving more and having the better player.
The question really implies whether another team sees the difference between what Demers and Vatanen respectively would bring to their club, and views that difference as warranting spending more assets or better assets to acquire Vatanen instead.
For a hypothetical...If Toronto wanted to add a puckmoving RD, why would Toronto want to trade Kadri for Vatanen when they could keep Kadri and probably get Demers for a pick and decent but not blue chip prospect. What move makes Toronto a better overall team on the ice? New Jersey is the same...why would they move a package of Henrique + for Vatanen if they could keep Henrique and add Demers for a much lower price. IS New Jersey with Vatanen but no Henrique better than New Jersey with Henrique and Demers?
That is the point I am trying to make. I am not saying teams wouldn't prefer Vatanen, just that it may make more sense for them to get a lesser player for less cost and keep their current roster intact. For the record, I do think Vatanen is the better player of the two, and age and contract status do play into things. I just wonder whether the difference between what each player would bring to a team is worth the higher cost of acquiring Vatanen instead of Demers. And I wonder if that market is currently affecting Vatanen's value, which is why I was asking what people realistically expect to get for him if a trade was made at this point.
Look at the market. How many top four defensemen - particularly RHD - have been traded in the past few years and what was the return? Parse it further - how many of those traded defensemen had good contracts (as opposed to pending free agents)?
I think the answer is that: (i) the return for top 4 defensemen has been high, even when on rental type of deals; and (ii) not many top 4 defensemen with good contracts have been traded.
Add to that the fact that the UFA market has been really thin - this year you basically had Shattenkirk and Alzner as the only two legitimate top 4 guys, and they got expensive contracts (more expensive than Vatanens).
For whatever reason, its a seller's market for top 4 defensemen.
I'll be surprised if Sami is dealt before the next off season if at all. Bob just paid a steep price to keep him. If he turns around and trades Sami now the trade effectively becomes Sami, Theo, & Stoner for X. That X would have to be awfully good to not have just moved Sami before the ED and hung on to Theo.
I'll be surprised if Sami is dealt before the next off season if at all. Bob just paid a steep price to keep him. If he turns around and trades Sami now the trade effectively becomes Sami, Theo, & Stoner for X. That X would have to be awfully good to not have just moved Sami before the ED and hung on to Theo.
Based upon this list above, what type of deal would you expect to see first in the "Sellers Market?" Demers for a 2nd and 3rd, or Vatanen for Kadri/Galchenyuk/etc etc?
Vermette at 3C will sink this team. He sucks and is only getting older.
The good news is we will be elite at preventing goals next year