bWo*
Guest
My god, I can't believe I am the voice of reason here today. What is this world coming too?
We won't win or lose the Cup over Lee Stempniak.
Stempniak about to win the conn smythe now
My god, I can't believe I am the voice of reason here today. What is this world coming too?
We won't win or lose the Cup over Lee Stempniak.
Because you agree on 1 plus top prospect. Say we have to move salary to announce it. Turn around deal Laich and then formally announce the Ladd deal. It's not this hard.
My god, I can't believe I am the voice of reason here today. What is this world coming too?
We won't win or lose the Cup over Lee Stempniak.
Not upset at all. Knew the moment GMBM identified no holes except a depth wing/D that it was another wasted cup run
The ducks won't win or lose the cup over McGinn. Boston won't win or lose the cup over Stempniak. Anaheim won't win or lose the cup over Pirri. LA won't win or lose the cup over Versteeg. Florida won't win or lose the cup over Purcell. Florida won't win or lose the cup over Hudler. Chicago won't win or lose the cup over Weise or Flash.
Why even bother making these trades if you already know that they're going to have absolutely zero impact on your Stanley cup chances?
With the exception of McGinn all these guys are soft wimps. They don't fit this team's style and they are pretty poor top 6 emergency replacements after Johansson.
They are decent fits on offensively challenged LA, and FL, BOS w no depth and cap strapped CHI.
Context.
that sneaky edit...
I would've liked Weise, Stempniak, McGinn, and Pirri for their prices. Pirri and Stempniak would be 3rd/4th line scoring depth with potential to move up into a scoring role in case of injury or poor play. Weise would be a perfect fit for the 4th line with ability to move up to the 3rd over Wilson, and still be able to put up points. McGinn would be a big physical presence on the 4th line.
Weise is tough, but not sure what that has to do with anything.
The point was they're all going to make a difference and Stempniak would too. It's ignorant to say he would have no impact. But, it's pointless to argue anyway.
Weise is tough, but not sure what that has to do with anything.
The point was they're all going to make a difference and Stempniak would too. It's ignorant to say he would have no impact. But, it's pointless to argue anyway.
Not anymore. Chris Nylan and the other host on Montreal radio were just ripping on him for turning "hollywood" and thinking he is a scorer now. Apparently he doesn't hit or stick his nose in anymore. Kind of forgot what got him to where he is.
Glencross had an awesome impact for us last year...well he had awesome impact for the Rangers that is. He was awful and cost us big time. Sometimes the best trades are the ones you don't make.
When a crusher starts to think he is a rusher, he is soon to become an usher.
When a crusher starts to think he is a rusher, he is soon to become an usher.
A couple of years into Lou’s tenure, Bruce Driver got injured, so I took over his spot on the power play. I had some good scoring success on the second power-play line, picking up four points in only four games. I was feeling pretty good about myself, but then Bruce came back, and suddenly I wasn’t getting any more time on the power play. Lou always had his pulse on everything going on in the locker room, so he saw me moping around at practice, slumping my head when I got off the team bus and generally just being kind of a downer.
So one day Lou calls me into his office and says, “I can see you aren’t happy right now, so let’s have a talk.†I was honest with him and said that I thought I’d played well on the power play and didn’t know why I’d got taken off it. And Lou, in his matter of fact way, goes, “Well yeah, Bruce came back.†I didn’t say anything, and he continued, “Let me tell you something. I like my team being like an orchestra. In order to make beautiful music, you need violinists, pianists, and you need drummers as well.†Then he paused. “What category do you think you fall in there?†At this point, I know I was pissed because I was in my 20s and thought I was more than capable of having a bigger scoring role. But even though I was turning red, he looked right at me and asked, “Where do you think you fall in there?†And I growled, “Drummer.†“Exactly,†he said. “If you wanna be a violinist, I will find another team that needs a violinist. Hell, I’ll call every other team in the NHL and see if they need a violinist, if that’s what you want. But for us to make good music, I need you to be a drummer and play your role here.â€
http://www.theplayerstribune.com/ken-daneyko-lou-lamoriello-leafs-devils/
Gonna respond to three different people here... lol
I think Stempniak's price would've been worth it. Calling Danault a former first rounder is giving him too much credit. The caps paid a 3rd for a guy who won't play and is a much worse player than Stempniak. And I think Stempniak would be in the lineup over Winnik/Latta/Galiev. Probably not Richards/Beagle because of faceoffs.
Considering Trotz is in love with Galiev right now, I'm not buying the "he's not a fit for the system" excuse. And I'd prefer Stempniak or Pirri before Chimera in the top 6. They're better fits and the hands of stone fits perfectly on the 3rd line.
We would've lost Game 5 against the Rangers in regulation if not for Glencross. IIRC the only time Glencross was a liability was his turnover in OT. And Weise had to play more of an offensive role on the Canadiens with their lack of depth. We don't have that problem here, and Trotz would make sure he knew his role.
I think Stempniak's price would've been worth it. Calling Danault a former first rounder is giving him too much credit. The caps paid a 3rd for a guy who won't play and is a much worse player than Stempniak. And I think Stempniak would be in the lineup over Winnik/Latta/Galiev. Probably not Richards/Beagle because of faceoffs.
Considering Trotz is in love with Galiev right now, I'm not buying the "he's not a fit for the system" excuse. And I'd prefer Stempniak or Pirri before Chimera in the top 6. They're better fits and the hands of stone fits perfectly on the 3rd line.
So your argument for adding a soft perimeter winger with questionable talent is Galiev? How's that working out?
Brilliant.
We would've lost Game 5 against the Rangers in regulation if not for Glencross. IIRC the only time Glencross was a liability was his turnover in OT. And Weise had to play more of an offensive role on the Canadiens with their lack of depth. We don't have that problem here, and Trotz would make sure he knew his role.
Yes? Sure looks like Trotz has no problem playing him on the 4th line.
What about that no goal against us in game 5 on ward? Think that takes triumph over glencross imo
Yes? Sure looks like Trotz has no problem playing him on the 4th line.