I thought he had a handful of good games right before the coaching change.
This is true but let's not let facts get in a way of bashing Yeo some more.
I know that Haula had struggled for a long time, so some may argue that he deserved less ice time and to sit out games. But the problem is (during the past couple months), Poms wasn't ANY better than Haula. Granlund wasn't any better than Haula. Many guys weren't any better during the slump, yet did they get reduced ice time? Did they get scratched? Were any held accountable for their sloppy play? Nope.Has nothing to do with bashing. He was the first one to be scratched every single game and there never any reason to why it was happening over other players who were having just as hard of a time getting on the points board. Granlund being one of them.
Haula also averaged 5 minutes more TOI last game (15:20), with 11:57 of that being on ES. Hell before that I think Haula would hover around 10 minutes of ice time and 4 of that would be on PK. He never saw the ice.
Granlund had 13 minutes of ice time with 10 of it being ES.
Suter had 27 minutes. Prosser had 20. Spurgeon has 21. It is almost like there was balancing in the ice time!
Coach sees something many of us were already seeing before the firing happened. Certain players were not getting the chance to flourish.
I know that Haula had struggled for a long time, so some may argue that he deserved less ice time and to sit out games. But the problem is, Poms wasn't ANY better than Haula. Granlund wasn't any better than Haula. Many guys weren't any better, yet did they get reduced ice time? Did they get scratched? Nope.
Many 3rd and 4th liners were carrying this team for a while when the top 6 was useless. Hell, how many games did we have when the top 6 couldn't even get shots on net? And yet, who got less ice time? Who got scratched?
Wait, so you're on record saying Haula--with a career high of 15 points and a guy who has never hit 10 goals or 10 assists in a season--is a better player than Granlund?
Saving this post to put in my signature#greathockeytakes Oh wait...
I don't think that's what she said, I think she said that Haula was better than Granlund during the whole slump thing, yet Haula was the one that got scratched, while Granlund was still spoonfed top ice time.
You are correct! My bad if the wording was misleading....I tried to fix it a bit. But yeah, I don't think Haula is better than Granlund. But for two guys no better than each other during this horrible slump, one was treated very differently than the other.I don't think that's what she said, I think she said that Haula was better than Granlund during the whole slump thing, yet Haula was the one that got scratched, while Granlund was still spoonfed top ice time.
You are correct! My bad if the wording was misleading....I tried to fix it a bit. But yeah, I don't think Haula is better than Granlund. But for two guys no better than each other during this horrible slump, one was treated very differently than the other.
Dear god Scandella and Brodin need to get back. Run:
Suter-Spurgeon
Scandella-Dumba
Reilly-Brodin
All at 20 minutes.
What do we think for D pairings when Brodin and Scandella are back?
Suter-Spurgeon
Scandella-Dumba
Brodin-Reilly?
Call me weird, but I'd like to see Suter/ Dumba, Spurgeron/Scandella, then Brodin/Brodin's clone or Reilly.
That is one hell of a mobile D.