The Yankees deserved this IMO, overpay through the nose to get other teams' FA who've never played a game for them and then nickel and dime their own guys.
The Yankees deserved this IMO, overpay through the nose to get other teams' FA who've never played a game for them and then nickel and dime their own guys.
They blew the market out for Ellsbury (proof being when do Boras clients ever sign before Christmas?), giving him $150-170 million before ever playing a game for them and made it out to be an inconvenience to offer their own guy more than $160 million.
They blew the market out for Ellsbury (proof being when do Boras clients ever sign before Christmas?), giving him $150-170 million before ever playing a game for them and made it out to be an inconvenience to offer their own guy more than $160 million.
Can you really blame him for taking $65-75 million more? Or for thinking he wasn't really wanted while the Yankees made Ellsbury a higher priority?
I don't see a single Yankees fan blaming him for taking the Seattle deal....
I don't blame Cano for taking the Mariner's deal at all. That is an amazing amount of money. I'll admit the Yankees were being a little stubborn with how they approached signing him, but at the same time Cano didn't budge either and made it clear he wanted $230+ ($300 was never going to happen).
The Yankees policy of not re-signing their FA in-season bit them in the ass. They could have negotiated a far more reasonable contract than what the Mariners gave Cano in season.
How do you know this? We've known for a while now that Cano wanted big bucks.
It's amazing how similar the Yankees and Devils are in their team philosophy. No re-signing during the season, no crazy facial hair aside from the playoffs, groomed hair, suits (although I think this is the case with most). If I were Lou I'd be rocking the 3 cup rings and WS ring all day.
The in-season negotiation policy is the one thing I don't understand. Why not just do what everyone else does and get favorable deals for you and your young studs before others get a shot at them? It's why the Yankees lost Cano and why the Devils lost Parise (arguably). These guys want security. You can give them that earlier without anyone else intervening. Why give that up?
Players sign in UFA years out of fear of injury and underperformance. It's why Cano wanted to negotiate in-season for a while. It's why nearly every player does too.
Baseball salaries are baffling and out of control.
What I do have issue with though is overpaying for questionable circumstances in Ellsbury and not overpaying for proven circumstances in Cano
The 10 years may have sucked because of the length, but you know what? The final years of the 10 that people were concerned with essentially gets made back regardless because these past 7 years he's played here and produced far more than the $$ we were paying him
Can't look at it that way though.
He's arguably going to be good for, what, 3-5 years of that deal at 2B? How many (clean) 2B play the position past 33-34 well?
And ok you move him to 3B or DH, but then you run into a Pujols problem. Massive amount of money for a CIF who isn't producing enough to warrant that contract.
Every single part of this post is speculation and it's just silly
People seem to forget how the Yankees operated prior to the operation get under the luxury tax mindset
Players in sports are paid based on what they have done with the expectation that it will be continued
Ellsbury is a general baseball player, Cano is the best at his position and among the best in the game today
Well not really speculation. Middle infielders do not age well. It's something that's tried and proven countless times over the history of the game. The only 2B I can think of off of the top of my head that played well into what was supposed to be their decline is Kent and Vidro?
It's just the history books. They tell you these kind of guys (unless they're implicated in juicing) don't age gracefully. Cano at age 34-35 isn't going to be worth 24 million dollars. Not even close. Most of these middle infielders with offensive gifts move to the corners as they get bigger (which I guess Cano may).
You don't pay players based on what they've done entirely. You project what they'll give you down the line too. The fact that they're paying him 240 million for TEN years is absolutely ludicrous. He's going to be a 40 year old corner infielder/DH hitting .250 and 10 homeruns. That's what history tells you.
Unless he uses steroids.
Obviously it's not a science and there's certainly an amount of speculation involved here but history is against his side. Is he one of the few athletes to transcend that? Maybe. But I'm sure not going to pay 240 million over 10 years to find out.