rocketdan9
Registered User
- Feb 5, 2009
- 20,411
- 13,210
To Rangers: John Moore, prospect (except Debrusk, Vaakanainen), 2nd round pick
To Bruins: Zuccarello (Rangers eat some of his salary)
To Bruins: Zuccarello (Rangers eat some of his salary)
There is no reason the Rangers should be taking back Moore's contract. 4 more years when we already have a logjam on defense
I highly doubt he would fetch a first, not that caliber of a player. However, you never know if a team gets really desperate.Source?
A prospect and a 2nd is what Zuccarello will fetch. Why would John Moore be in this deal??
I wouldn't mind taking Moore back. I guess it depends on the prospect. 2.75 is going to be a super discount deal by the end of that contract. We could always flip him or have him eat minutes if we decide to move someone else. He doesn't seem like the kind of guy who would be hard to find a buyer for or who would break your heart if you had to cut him loose. Serviceable journeyman dman. If the prospect is good, I'm in.
Salary match... NYR would still need to eat some of Zucca salary
Unless they can eat 80 percent of it
And what are you giving the Rangers in additional assets to either take Moore or eat %80?
I already listed above
2nd round pick and prospect (except Debrusk or Vaaka)
Moore has been outstanding and I don’t see them trading him. He’s the only reason they’ve been able to weather the storm without Chara. I also don’t think the Bruins would trade Moore so soon after signing him.
And why Zuccarello? Nice player but as a small, left shot winger I don’t think he’s what they need.
The guy in NY that could help Boston is Kevin Hayes, filling in as 3C.
Moore just creates even more of a logjam at LHDTo Rangers: John Moore, prospect (except Debrusk, Vaakanainen), 2nd round pick
To Bruins: Zuccarello (Rangers eat some of his salary)
Moore just creates even more of a logjam at LHD
If you want Zucc it’s a 1st+
Look at what a much worse Nash fetchedAre you jokin?
Zucca is not worth a 1st... he is already on a slow decline
Look at what a much worse Nash fetched
This is true
But that was a mistakes