Nope. That's not what I said at all. I said Mika gets a higher percentage of his points (almost half) on the PP. Landeskog scores higher at evens.Are you saying that the Rangers PP is so much better than...the Avalanche's?
So much bias without any data to at least back up the argument.
Last 4 years as a sample size Mika has the most Goals and Points and best PPG. But the point that "not even close" is far from the truth. You can easily argue others are better defensively and Landeskog at 216 points in 217 games is barely behind Mika's 248 points in 242 games.
Perhaps Mika has the most complete package? He definitely has the best shot of all the Swedes and when he is at his A game his anticipation, size, speed and hands are difficult to contain.
Is the better than Zibanejad though? Not really.
Are you saying that the Rangers PP is so much better than...the Avalanche's?
Pretty sure he wanted to leave, or at least preferred Carolina. Don’t think it’s any more than that.Still not sure why the Rangers let him get away
When Zib is “on his game” he’s better tooPettersson is better when he’s on his game and I’d say Forsberg might be better as well
When Zib is “on his game” he’s better too
at Landeskog being a complimentary playerAs a swede, I cant belive people here takes Landeskog over Zibanejad. Zibanejad just is a better player.
Landeskog is a nice complimentary piece, but Zibby is just a straw better
at Landeskog being a complimentary player