Go Wings
Registered User
Hronek is a decent 2nd pairing defensemen. Zadina is barely a 3rd line winger at this point.
Hronek everyday of the week and twice on Sunday
Hronek everyday of the week and twice on Sunday
Fans always greatly overvalue their players. Look at Habs fans. They were saying a 1st+ for Petry.Avs fans were saying a 1++ for Girard, and Hronek puts up more points than he does
Jesus, that's a horrible interpretation. It most likely doesn't mean "on thin ice", it's rather SY seeing a lot of potential beyond Seiders early, already great performance and that he needs to continue to work to become the best he can possibly be.
...
I guess everybody can relax on Mo. Has that German video about his off season regimen already been posted here? WIIM had it a couple days ago. Mo reminds me a lot of Dirk, whose work ethic was off the charts.
It’s over the top. Hronek’s real crime isn’t being a bad player but being miscast. Just to add on to what you said, he’s also played more PK minutes than any other Wing over the past 3 years when he should really be the #5 PKer.The Hronek hate around here is hilarious. Some posters saying we need to get rid of a 24 year old RHD who's good for 40 points a year, who produces very well 5v5, who plays 22 minutes a night. Not to mention he drives shot attempts and starts the majority of his shifts in the dzone. He also plays against the opponents best players.
Yeah, about that.......... I was being sarcastic about Seider (proving a point if you will). Maybe you should read the post I quoted and put it all together.
is that what the kids call it these days?Can Zadina twirl an octopus?
And Larkin is the 2nd worst defensive forward in the league? I wouldn't say Larkin is great defensively but he's certainly not bad. Plus/Minus is such an irrelevant stat. Hronek playing the most minutes on the worst team is the reason for his plus/minus. Look no further than Athanasiou who upon going to a good team suddenly puts up a decent plus/minus.Not to beat a dead horse, if you sum up the last three seasons, Hronek had the worst plus minus in the league.
View attachment 570250
Will also be funny if we sign Klingberg, and he does some of the same stuff Hronek does, people will be a lot more forgiving.The Hronek hate around here is hilarious. Some posters saying we need to get rid of a 24 year old RHD who's good for 40 points a year, who produces very well 5v5, who plays 22 minutes a night. Not to mention he drives shot attempts and starts the majority of his shifts in the dzone. He also plays against the opponents best players.
Does plus minus tell the whole story? No. It's it useful to compare teammates? Sure.And Larkin is the 2nd worst defensive forward in the league? I wouldn't say Larkin is great defensively but he's certainly not bad. Plus/Minus is such an irrelevant stat. Hronek playing the most minutes on the worst team is the reason for his plus/minus. Look no further than Athanasiou who upon going to a good team suddenly puts up a decent plus/minus.
I thought you were posting this chart to show how silly it is to use +/- to criticize Hronek. He's played twice as many games as nearly every name on the list. Furthermore if you look at the names doing any better on +/- per game, you'll see that they're either Moritz Seider or are playing at least 4 minutes less per game than Hronek and generally against bottom of the lineup competition. Sure, Hronek hasn't been able to handle being a 1st pairing defenseman on a bottom 5 team in his 2nd, 3rd and 4th seasons in the league, but clearly, he's not in a category of his own at all.Does plus minus tell the whole story? No. It's it useful to compare teammates? Sure.
The Wings have sucked. Everyone takes a hit to their plus minus. But some people are in a special category. Clearly, Hronek is very very not good defensively. He's in a category of his own.
Last three seasons, defensemen, Wings:
View attachment 570264
Factor in 199gp vs. the next (Staal) @ 127, DDK @ 114, Nemeth @ 103gp.Does plus minus tell the whole story? No. It's it useful to compare teammates? Sure.
The Wings have sucked. Everyone takes a hit to their plus minus. But some people are in a special category. Clearly, Hronek is very very not good defensively. He's in a category of his own.
Last three seasons, defensemen, Wings:
View attachment 570264
You have to take into consideration matchups as well. The entire team has been shit defensively for years, and Hronek has had to match up against our opponents best lines. Just look at some of our other defensemen. Take a look at our favorite scapegoat the last 10 years, Jonathan Ericsson. He was good when he didn't have to play above his level. He was great on the third pairing. When put on the first pairing, he sucked. Same is true with Kronwall. He was good at the second pairing, but not that good on the first pairing. He was never a plus player on the first pairing. Fact is, he was never a plus player again after Brad Stuart.Does plus minus tell the whole story? No. It's it useful to compare teammates? Sure.
The Wings have sucked. Everyone takes a hit to their plus minus. But some people are in a special category. Clearly, Hronek is very very not good defensively. He's in a category of his own.
Last three seasons, defensemen, Wings:
His relative GA/60:Is there a better metric to use to determine Hronek's defensive abilities? I'd love to see it.
As it stands, his defensive game looks like shit with the eye test and his stats look like shit too.
As far as the thread is concerned, yes, I'm confident a GM will over-pay for Hronek at some point.
Still worth more than Zadina
I am totally down with signing Klingberg, but I do find it funny when any of the Hronek haters are cool with signing him. His (negative) defensive impacts are really similar to Hronek's while playing 5 minutes less a night and starting way more of his shifts in the o zone. These D are good because they compensate with their offense, but anyone that dislikes Hronek is going to really hate Klingberg.Will also be funny if we sign Klingberg, and he does some of the same stuff Hronek does, people will be a lot more forgiving.
And Larkin is the 2nd worst defensive forward in the league? I wouldn't say Larkin is great defensively but he's certainly not bad. Plus/Minus is such an irrelevant stat. Hronek playing the most minutes on the worst team is the reason for his plus/minus. Look no further than Athanasiou who upon going to a good team suddenly puts up a decent plus/minus.
How long did it take Yzerman to get rid of Drouin ? I feel like Zadina is in that spot where Drouin was before he dealt him
Leddy's +/- was much worse than Hronek's when he was traded but he has been a plus with the Blues and earned a nice 4 year deal with themYou have to take into consideration matchups as well. The entire team has been shit defensively for years, and Hronek has had to match up against our opponents best lines. Just look at some of our other defensemen. Take a look at our favorite scapegoat the last 10 years, Jonathan Ericsson. He was good when he didn't have to play above his level. He was great on the third pairing. When put on the first pairing, he sucked. Same is true with Kronwall. He was good at the second pairing, but not that good on the first pairing. He was never a plus player on the first pairing. Fact is, he was never a plus player again after Brad Stuart.
+/- doesn't say much about how good a player is defensively.
I am not saying Hronek is good defensively. I am just saying you can't determine it with +/-. You can't even use the eye test. Is his defensive partner good at keeping his position, or does he have to cover for him. If one defensemen gets out of position, often both will be. And then there's the forwards, they have their roles to play defensively too, and they have been terrible at that.