Hyman's spot is a lock as long as Babs is behind the bench but what was the purpose with multiple changes to the pp when all they had to do was slide Kap into AM's spot while he's out ?I'm surprised people still think Hyman and Kapanen are fighting for spots. It's Ennis/Leivo and Kap that are. I do think Kap should be in over Ennis though.
It's going to be a domino effect when Matthews returns. Matthews takes back the left side on the PP, Tavares goes back to net front on PP #1, Marleau goes back to net front on PP #2 and Hyman goes back to 5 on 5 and PK duties.
Maybe something more visual helps.I don't know if he understands the PP structure or he just hates hyman, its hard to tell with these guys lol
It's not as much change as you think. Matthews is a shooter on the left side, Tavares is also a really good shooter (Better than Kap) so he goes in his spot which leaves a net front presence spot. Marleau has that role on the PP#2 so he goes to do that on PP#1. Hyman comes in as an option for the net front presence. If it was any other role Hyman wouldn't get that job.Hyman's spot is a lock as long as Babs is behind the bench but what was the purpose with multiple changes to the pp when all they had to do was slide Kap into AM's spot while he's out ?
basically all it looks like is Babs using AM's injury to get his MVP on the pp
Me too! He should be on a Beast Line though! Not a Scoring Line!Love Hyman, guys a beast
Me too! He should be on a Beast Line though! Not a Scoring Line!
Looks like they want a LH shooter where Matthew was. They started with Marleau, who didn't work, so they switch the setup after.Hyman's spot is a lock as long as Babs is behind the bench but what was the purpose with multiple changes to the pp when all they had to do was slide Kap into AM's spot while he's out ?
basically all it looks like is Babs using AM's injury to get his MVP on the pp
Would be understandable if Zach didn't have clubs for hands! Iy seems to me that Babs is doing everything he can to get Hymans stats up,so that he doesn't need to keep explaining why he gets so much ice -time. Seriously, Zach being the insert for Auston makes this beyond obvious. End of the game...empty net...put out Zach the sharpshooter. It 's ridiculous. AS a paying customer,do you want to see more Zach or more Marner?It's not as much change as you think. Matthews is a shooter on the left side, Tavares is also a really good shooter (Better than Kap) so he goes in his spot which leaves a net front presence spot. Marleau has that role on the PP#2 so he goes to do that on PP#1. Hyman comes in as an option for the net front presence. If it was any other role Hyman wouldn't get that job.
Edit.
Matthews also shoots left, just like Tavares. Kapanen shoots right.
Kap being a right shot playing the left side on the pp is a benefit and how most coach's run there pp .It's not as much change as you think. Matthews is a shooter on the left side, Tavares is also a really good shooter (Better than Kap) so he goes in his spot which leaves a net front presence spot. Marleau has that role on the PP#2 so he goes to do that on PP#1. Hyman comes in as an option for the net front presence. If it was any other role Hyman wouldn't get that job.
Edit.
Matthews also shoots left, just like Tavares. Kapanen shoots right.
and most coach's run there pp with the shooter on his off wing which you already know but choose to ignoreLooks like they want a LH shooter where Matthew was. They started with Marleau, who didn't work, so they switch the setup after.
Babs could have easily just put Hyman in Matthews spot if you want to play your stupid "Hyman's dad" game. Gets Hyman extra minutes in a prime spot and the smallest amount of changes to the setup.
So to summarizeKap being a right shot playing the left side on the pp is a benefit and how most coach's run there pp .
basically all this switching is just Babs creating a spot for Hyman
Sure do, but we don't. See my last point for the hilarious hypocrisy of your post.and most coach's run there pp with the shooter on his off wing which you already know but choose to ignore
i could have swore AM shot quite often from his spot on the pp but i guess i'll ignore that as well since the obvious choice to be promoted to the pp once Mathews went down was the Hyman , lolSo to summarize
Your issue is Babs changed the entire PP setup to accomodate Hyman (heh)
And your solution is to use a RH shot and switch to a one-time focus rather than the tip/long pass we have now. Aka you want to change our PP setup to accomodate your boy Kapanen
I couldn't disagree more! Why is he not with Matthews? Most suspect the reason is Auston doesn't want him there. I think this as well. I'm already noticing how both JT and Marner are ignoring Zach in the O zone.. Zachs lack of skill is cringy to watch.I don’t think he really prevented Matthews from scoring goals and he certainly hasn’t hindered Tavares, so what’s the big deal?
we don't because Mathews was pissed last year and forced his way onto the first pp unitSure do, but we don't. See my last point for the hilarious hypocrisy of your post.
If they're shooting one timers maybe. That's what they tried last year with Matthews and Nylander switching spots. That didn't work as well as their original spots.Kap being a right shot playing the left side on the pp is a benefit and how most coach's run there pp .
basically all this switching is just Babs creating a spot for Hyman
He didn't one time it, he stopped and shot. One of the reason it works is because the puck is going completely cross ice from Marner (righty) to the far side with two tip threats in the middle. For Kap to one-time you're looking at more sticks in the middle of the ice aka not as far for the goalie to go. The other option is to have Rielly and Kap control more for the one-time option, which is how most traditional Pp setups work.i could have swore AM shot quite often from his spot on the pp but i guess i'll ignore that as well since the obvious choice to be promoted to the pp once Mathews went down was the Hyman , lol
Marner could play the other side of the ice and have 4 one-timer options if they wanted. So that's not it.we don't because Mathews was pissed last year and forced his way onto the first pp unit
Surely you are not naive enough to think players don't have some input when it comes to line-mates.Wait what?? Where does everyone get that Mathews demanded Babcock he doesnt want to play with Hyman?? I sure hope this isnt true because thats a selfish pos thing to do... I dont believe it, I feel like Mathews is better than this or else thats really ****ing disappointing.
Would be understandable if Zach didn't have clubs for hands! Iy seems to me that Babs is doing everything he can to get Hymans stats up,so that he doesn't need to keep explaining why he gets so much ice -time. Seriously, Zach being the insert for Auston makes this beyond obvious. End of the game...empty net...put out Zach the sharpshooter. It 's ridiculous. AS a paying customer,do you want to see more Zach or more Marner?
it pretty much impossible to one time it unless your on you off wing and that's why AM stopped it before he shotHe didn't one time it, he stopped and shot. One of the reason it works is because the puck is going completely cross ice from Marner (righty) to the far side with two tip threats in the middle. For Kap to one-time you're looking at more sticks in the middle of the ice aka not as far for the goalie to go. The other option is to have Rielly and Kap control more for the one-time option, which is how most traditional Pp setups work.
The obvious choice was Marleau to PP1, which we saw. PP2 is a different setup altogether.
But 'demanding' are you serious? They f***ing better not. Its one thing to sell a free agent on potential line mates, but when the season is on its the coach that decides where they player plays, they need to shut up and do there job the coach is the boss with governing the team. at least in every sport that Ive ever known....Surely you are not naive enough to think players don't have some input when it comes to line-mates.
The whole hockey world knows the Leafs PP goes through Mitch. They have used Morgan lately as a set-up option(which has been exciting) ....Auston sniping from the left side ,JT as the net presence and Kadri in the high slot. This has been successful and fantastic to watch!He didn't one time it, he stopped and shot. One of the reason it works is because the puck is going completely cross ice from Marner (righty) to the far side with two tip threats in the middle. For Kap to one-time you're looking at more sticks in the middle of the ice aka not as far for the goalie to go. The other option is to have Rielly and Kap control more for the one-time option, which is how most traditional Pp setups work.
The obvious choice was Marleau to PP1, which we saw. PP2 is a different setup altogether.