joshjull
Registered User
Rare yes. May be better elsewhere? Maybe.
I'm happy with their progression at this point.
What progression would that be?
Rare yes. May be better elsewhere? Maybe.
I'm happy with their progression at this point.
And they're still making them, if you think about it; where are the decent FA's who want to come to Oil Country to make the Oilers better?
No they're not. The have no two way forwards, just a bunch of run and gunners. Name me a team that wins with players like that? I'll save you the time, there isn't.
This is why we are doing full blown rebuild. Us..like Edmonton are not likely to attract decent FA's ..
What you see with Larsson, Girgensons ect ect maybe Grigs.. these are going to be our glue players....secondary pieces...we've yet to obtain our game breakers... we'll add vets later when we're satisfied with our potential elite talent.
Actually they brute forced their way to where they are now and I believe we are following their model. They accumulated a tron of picks in a short span and many of the players that allowed them to win the cup were those picks.I've made it pretty clear in many posts that I don't see what Chicago did as a repeatable model. Nor was it a rebuild. It was a crap owner not spending the money to ice a winning team. Its painful to have to repeatedly explain this. Then they got lucky on two fronts (death of the elder Wirtz and Kane draft lottery) to turn things around.
They won the Cup? When was this?
No they're not. The have no two way forwards, just a bunch of run and gunners. Name me a team that wins with players like that? I'll save you the time, there isn't.
Actually they brute forced their way to where they are now and I believe we are following their model. They accumulated a tron of picks in a short span and many of the players that allowed them to win the cup were those picks.
How is it no able to be emulated? It's not that hard to set yourself up to pick high. We wont even need to win the lottery like they did. Reinhart is a very comparable player to Towes. And we're going to have a great chance at McDavid or Barzal. In fact if you follow the 2015 draft the top 2 players will be better than Kane and 3-5 have a shot at it. The only luck Chicago ran into was Byfuglien and maybe Brouwer.
I'm really surprised you don't think the Chicago model is repeatable. It's much more repeatable than Pittsburgh.
Are you familiar with Steve Yzerman's career?6 more years of CoHo being completely clueless in his own end...
Wayne Gretzky once called New Jersey a "Mickey Mouse" organization. And then Mickey gave birth to Scott Stevens and Martin Brodeur and a host of other amazing talent to net the organization several Cups and many epic seasons.
The Scott ****, Kaleta's waiver, the overall league venom being spewed at us -- did we just have our own Mickey Mouse moment?
Is this the bottom?
Smells like it, that's for sure. We'll see.
Yeah, he called them a MM organization in 1983. A decade plus later, they started winning Cups.
Let's hope it doesn't take that long to rebuild.
I'm glad you responded. You have a level head. I admit I didn't mean "set" as in all done. They are set with guys who have the talent to pour in goals. The two way guys are lacking, yes. So are a few D and solid goaltending. When I see them play, I generally like the effort they play with. and I can see the high talent. In regards to the Sabres, I like the rebuild and personally don't mind the suffering we are going thru. Granted I wish the effort was better most nights. And like you, I pay thousands annually to the Sabres. I go. I watch. I get into it. But I stay calm because I know what we have here and what the goal is ultimately.
Look at our assets ... Id say that is competence!
And look at some of our assets drowning in the deep end on a bad team. I'm not sure where this whole "Let's play every teenager we have" attitude came from, but I don't like it. At the very least, Zadorov needs to be back in London at the 9-game mark.
I'm all for acquiring top players in the draft. However, I want them handled correctly, and at this point, it looks like Regier and RR are running a total **** show.
What? The won the draft lottery with a 8.1% chance and landed their Conn Smythe winner from their latest Cup win and he should have won it the first time. Youre really going to argue thats repeatable
Also you and a few others don't quite grasp the impact of Bill Wirtz death on that organization. Then went from spending like a small to mid sized market to spending like the big market franchise they are. There isn'tt a chance in hell they would have locked up all the guys they did plus sign the Hossa's of the world if he still owned the team. Thus no Cup.
Why that matters with us is we have little chance of signing thsoe types even if we turn things around through the draft. The reality is at some point Darcy will need to overpay to get some of the pieces we need via trade. Signing key UFAs isn;t likely to be a path we can take.
Exactly, I don't mind going through a rebuild. What bothers me the most is setting up our very important prospects to fail. This team is completely RUSHING these prospects into the NHL. On a competent team Grigs, Girgs, Risto, Zadarov, are all not playing on the NHL team. They should all be in developmental leagues. (I know JFB is huge on this, and I completely agree with him) We are following the Oilers model and its going to be a complete and utter failure.
Its fairly rare to play this many teenagers and youngsters in general. You really don't need a crystal ball to know these guys may be better of elsewhere right now.
Agreed. I think there are ~7 waiver-exempt skaters on the Sabres, and 48 NHL contracts, if I count correctly.
In order for BUF to bring in "filler" vets to bridge the rebuild and allow some (not all, obviously) of the less-ready prospects to develop in Rochester, one of 3 things will need to happen, IMO:
1. Trade vets like Miller, Stafford, Leino, maybe Ehrhoff for bridge vets, instead of for picks / prospects. However, I just can't see BUF doing that - I think they want the picks / prospects, as those picks / prospects can then be (traded as-is, or bundled with other picks / prospects) flipped to a greater number of teams to target a greater number of vets than strictly those teams who would be willing to take Miller, Staffor, Leino, etc.
2. Same as above, but take a "bridge" vet back with the pick/prospect. I assume the pick / prospect would be a lesser value than the analogous pick or prospect in scenario #1, since the "bridge" vet coming to BUF would also have value. The way for BUF to obtain a greater number of trade partners is to take a salary dump vet from their trading partner. This type of scenario has been discussed frequently by others.
3. Release (Rochester) prospects and claim waiver-eligible vets given BUF's low-standings. Problem is this season a waiver-eligible vet only needed to clear once at beginning of the season, so if I understand this change correctly, this waiver-claim tool is a lot less viable as a "net" to catch someone BUF would be interested in.
Bottom line - I just don't see BUF doing much to acquire "bridge" vets for this season of the rebuild until we get to the 2014 offseason.