StreetHawk
Registered User
- Sep 30, 2017
- 26,238
- 9,784
I would agree. Everyone makes it out that Chicago was the only team that messed up because they opted to select a QB that draft in the top 10. But, there were other QB needy teams in the top 10 that didn't take Watson or Mahomes. So, that also reinforces that people have revisionist history of that draft.Mahomes is the goat but that turned out to be a win win. The Bills traded down, drafted the best CB in the league, got an emerging elite MLB and ended their 18 year playoff drought. And the qb they ended up getting the next year looks like a top 3-5 QB in his own right.
Mahomes wasn't a can't miss prospect nor was it a top pick. It was the tenth pick those picks are traded every year. The only bad move was picking KC and not Houston to trade with. We would have got a way higher 1st. But the literal best CB in the game and an elite young MLB in return is pretty damn good for a #10 overall pick.
Look at the teams that passed on a QB in the top 10 and where they are now with their current QB?
Cleveland - Baker not elite. Needs a running game
SF - Jimmy G, Shanny needs to protect him. I don't think once the D gets paid, that he can carry an offense
Jets - probably wouldn't matter given how poorly they are run
Ten - managed to do ok with Tanny after they moved off Mariotta
Jax - needed a QB. Who knows if they keep that team together after their AFC Champ run a couple years back
Car - moved off Cam and have Bridgewater. Decent starter, but not a top 10-15 guy IMO.