Friedman: Yandle not asked to waive NMC. Buyout or trade incoming?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bacon Artemi Bravo

Registered User
Sep 20, 2007
7,090
9,781
It doesn't matter? Seattle taking on that contract voluntarily is incredibly unlikely.
Of course it's unlikely, but there is literally zero benefit to not at least exposing him. Any additional player to expose is a benefit to the team so that they can protect someone else, isnt it?
 

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
25,271
11,853
California
Is there really a third D that would be such a huge loss? I mean maybe Forsling, Nutivaara? Neither are huge losses in my opinion. Obviously you’d rather lose Yandle over them but do you really pay to trade him?
 

FinlandPanther

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2009
21,149
17,036
Florida
Is there really a third D that would be such a huge loss? I mean maybe Forsling, Nutivaara? Neither are huge losses in my opinion. Obviously you’d rather lose Yandle over them but do you really pay to trade him?
Forsling was an absolute stud for the Panthers last season so yes if we lose him, it’s going to be horrible.
 

ucanthanzalthetruth

#CatsAreCooked
Jul 13, 2013
27,507
30,059
Is there really a third D that would be such a huge loss? I mean maybe Forsling, Nutivaara? Neither are huge losses in my opinion. Obviously you’d rather lose Yandle over them but do you really pay to trade him?
Forsling was fantastic last year. Like out of nowhere. It would be a huge blow. Nutivaara is bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Laus723

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
25,271
11,853
California
Forsling was an absolute stud for the Panthers last season so yes if we lose him, it’s going to be horrible.

Forsling was fantastic last year. Like out of nowhere. It would be a huge blow. Nutivaara is bad.
Yeah I knew Forsling was really good but so was Jacob Middleton for the Sharks a few years ago. He basically allowed Burns to play at a Norris level. In my opinion yes you want to protect Forsling over Yandle and I think asking him to waive or buying him out is the correct decision. It’s more just the paying to trade him.
 

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
13,351
31,937
Western PA
Of course it's unlikely, but there is literally zero benefit to not at least exposing him. Any additional player to expose is a benefit to the team so that they can protect someone else, isnt it?

No. If he's not getting protected and he's not getting selected, he's irrelevant to the process. Florida has Nutivaara to meet the 27/54 threshold for a signed defenseman.
 

Clint

Registered User
Jul 14, 2003
6,937
604
He quickly became a scapegoat for fans. At first, his production made up for clear defensive lapses. The flack he caught was generally unwarranted for a couple years.

This past season, he was legit awful. His skating has declined quite a bit, his play in our zone is getting worse and he hasn't thrown a hit in years to avoid injury and keep his iron man streak alive.

He isn't even good on the powerplay anymore. I'm sure he's a fine person, but his time as a Panther should be over.

I will back this opinion 100%. I was one of the final members on the Panther's board to defend Yandle and argue that his offensive production made up for hist lapses in judgement defensively.

But this past season was the straw that broke the camel's back. He only brought utility as a powerplay specialist but at this point but he's been surpassed by guys like Weegar and Ekblad, who are far more reliable defensively. It finally got to the point where even I couldn't defend his lapses and seen through the lens of a difficult cap situation over the next few years it would be difficult to justify hanging on to him.

I'm sure he could still bring value to some franchise out there who could shelter him almost exclusively powerplay minutes on a cheap contract. The issue is that the Panthers are no longer that franchise.
 

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,532
46,543
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
Is your opinion of Ekman Larsson really that low?
Not at all. OEL is a very good defenseman. Arizona is not going to be competitive for several years. Yandle will we a UFA by the time Arizona is ready to spend and be competitive. Meanwhile, Florida is ready to compete now.

This is strictly about timing. OEL is a much more appropriate asset for Florida. Meanwhile, Yandle can play out his last couple of years in Arizona where it al started out and ride off into the sunset.

Should Florida add an asset in payment for the huge upgrade they’ll get the next couple of years? I don’t know. I guess that depends on how you feel about the last few years of the OEL deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Laus723

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
5,209
6,175
Can't they just go 4-4-1 and protect Barkov, Huberdeau, Bennett, Verhaege, Ekblad, Weegar, Yandle, Forsling and Bobrovsky? Or is Vatrano that important?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pepe Cahones

cwede

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 1, 2010
9,804
7,680
Was the buyout deadline yesterday?

These are the near-term dates:
July 13: Deadline for clubs to ask a player to waive his no-move clause for expansion draft.
24 hours after the conclusion of the Stanley Cup final: First buyout period begins.
July 16: Last day for teams to place a player on waivers prior to the expansion draft trade/waiver freeze (noon ET).
July 16: Deadline for players to agree to waive their no-move clause for the expansion draft.
July 17 at 3 p.m ET to July 22 at 1 pm ET: Trade freeze
amongst the 31 NHL clubs. Seattle is allowed to make trades with any club during this time.
July 17: At 5pmET, firm deadline for each club to submit its expansion draft protection list
July 18-21 Opening of the RFA/UFA interview period Kraken have an exclusive window from July 18 at 10amET to July 21 at 10amET to speak with, and potentially sign any RFAs or UFAs left unprotected for the expansion draft by the 30 NHL club
July 21: There’s a 10amET deadline for Seattle to submit its expansion draft selections to Central Registry and the NHLPA. Also, a 10amET deadline for the Kraken to submit contracts for any of those pending RFAs/UFAs they’ve been able to sign during the interview period.
The NHL announces the expansion draft results at 8pmET.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cats2TheCup

kerrabria

Registered User
May 3, 2018
3,883
4,753
Can't they just go 4-4-1 and protect Barkov, Huberdeau, Bennett, Verhaege, Ekblad, Weegar, Yandle, Forsling and Bobrovsky? Or is Vatrano that important?
We would lose Duclair or Hornqvist, not Vatrano.
Hornqvist is that important, and Duclair isn't somebody you're okay with for losing for nothing. He's a proven top 6 winger and RFA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Laus723

Laus723

Paradise hockey
Sponsor
Jan 27, 2006
31,554
5,312
Wellington, FL
Not at all. OEL is a very good defenseman. Arizona is not going to be competitive for several years. Yandle will we a UFA by the time Arizona is ready to spend and be competitive. Meanwhile, Florida is ready to compete now.

This is strictly about timing. OEL is a much more appropriate asset for Florida. Meanwhile, Yandle can play out his last couple of years in Arizona where it al started out and ride off into the sunset.

Should Florida add an asset in payment for the huge upgrade they’ll get the next couple of years? I don’t know. I guess that depends on how you feel about the last few years of the OEL deal.

Didn’t OEL really struggle last year? Or was that more due to the team and not him?

I will back this opinion 100%. I was one of the final members on the Panther's board to defend Yandle and argue that his offensive production made up for hist lapses in judgement defensively.

But this past season was the straw that broke the camel's back. He only brought utility as a powerplay specialist but at this point but he's been surpassed by guys like Weegar and Ekblad, who are far more reliable defensively. It finally got to the point where even I couldn't defend his lapses and seen through the lens of a difficult cap situation over the next few years it would be difficult to justify hanging on to him.

I'm sure he could still bring value to some franchise out there who could shelter him almost exclusively powerplay minutes on a cheap contract. The issue is that the Panthers are no longer that franchise.

ello Clint. I completely agree with this. I defended him due to his offensive output, but his play throughout the year and even more so in the playoffs just made it impossible. Not sure if he’s THAT concerned with his “iron man” (lol) streak or if he’s just regressed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clint

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,532
46,543
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
Didn’t OEL really struggle last year? Or was that more due to the team and not him?



ello Clint. I completely agree with this. I defended him due to his offensive output, but his play throughout the year and even more so in the playoffs just made it impossible. Not sure if he’s THAT concerned with his “iron man” (lol) streak or if he’s just regressed.
OEL hasn't looked like to 20+ goal scoring Top5 and Top7 in Norris voting player he was before Tocchet was hired. But he's still very good. Think end-stage Jay Bouwmeester.
 

SML2

Registered User
Jan 1, 2018
4,866
7,079
The NHL needs to step into these buyouts. I envision Seattle signing Suter, Yandle, and another handful of these buyout vets for close to minimum and then raffling them off to contenders at the deadline for 1st rounders.
 

FinlandPanther

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2009
21,149
17,036
Florida
The NHL needs to step into these buyouts. I envision Seattle signing Suter, Yandle, and another handful of these buyout vets for close to minimum and then raffling them off to contenders at the deadline for 1st rounders.
Yandle isn’t getting you a first rounder lmao. This isn’t 2012.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad