Speculation: Yakopov reminds me about Daigle

Status
Not open for further replies.

SeriousBusiness

T.Hall da man
Oct 5, 2003
3,628
3
really? i'm what can easily be defined as a "hardcore oilers fan"... i read all the articles and watch all the interviews, i'm on this board almost literally every day of my life, i watch every single game.... all this, and i don't remember ever hearing that yakupov was a "katz pick", let alone it being considered common knowledge... now i might have the worst memory ever, but i don't think so

It was just the imaginations of a few posters running wild before the draft.
 

oobga

Tier 2 Fan
Aug 1, 2003
23,214
18,238
Wasn't it Bob Mac that tweeted about how the Oilers scouting staff wanted Murray and were overruled? I don't think he pointed to Katz specifically, but said the decision came from high up. So, that probably means Lowe or Katz or both because we know Tambo was just a puppet and fall guy for Lowe.
 

McJadeddog

Registered User
Sep 25, 2003
20,237
5,173
Regina, Saskatchewan
The suggestion was (I think from Dreger or Mackenzie or maybe Elliot Friedman) that the majority of scouts wanted Murray but they were overruled. There was no suggestion as to who that person was. Whether it was Stu MacGregor, Tambo, Lowe, or Katz was unclear.

People just took it to mean it was Katz.

yeah, i've heard that reported, but nowhere have i heard it mentioned that katz was the one who over-ruled the decision... i have always taken it to mean tambo or lowe... i could be wrong i suppose

at any point, it most certainly is not common-knowledge that katz was the one who did this... heck, its only rumor and speculation that an "over-rule" happened at all
 

Mc5RingsAndABeer

5-14-6-1
May 25, 2011
20,184
1,385
If Eakins is benching Yakupov to protect the lead (i.e. going for results), then why isn't Yakupov out there on the PP when we need to score?

You are either trying your best to win or you are focusing on development. You can't keep Yak off the ice in situations that he's not suited for then at the same time keep him off the ice for situations he would excel at.
 

Alberta

Registered User
Jul 20, 2005
1,710
18
yeah, i've heard that reported, but nowhere have i heard it mentioned that katz was the one who over-ruled the decision... i have always taken it to mean tambo or lowe... i could be wrong i suppose

at any point, it most certainly is not common-knowledge that katz was the one who did this... heck, its only rumor and speculation that an "over-rule" happened at all

You're right, all McKenzie says is "higher authority".

https://twitter.com/TSNBobMcKenzie/statuses/386716521780609024

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie

To answer @FriedgeHNIC's on air question, re: Yakupov vs Murray, and I suspect he knew answer: Yes, majority of EDM scouts wanted Murray.


https://twitter.com/TSNBobMcKenzie/statuses/386717253430833152

@TSNBobMcKenzie

Decision to take Yakupov over Murray came from a higher authority. That's not indictment of decision, only saying how it was arrived at.
 

Raab

Registered User
Oct 6, 2007
18,085
2,777
If Eakins is benching Yakupov to protect the lead (i.e. going for results), then why isn't Yakupov out there on the PP when we need to score?

You are either trying your best to win or you are focusing on development. You can't keep Yak off the ice in situations that he's not suited for then at the same time keep him off the ice for situations he would excel at.

Except Yakupov isn't our best option on the PP. Ryan Smyth who is arguably one of the worst options on the PP according to fans has scored as many goals as Yakupov this season on the PP. This despite the fact that he has played roughly 16 less minutes on the PP this season then Yakupov. On top of that Yakupov has not scored on the PP since Nov 21. I know if I was coaching I'd think long and hard about sending him out, especially if he's not doing what's asked of him during the game.
 

oobga

Tier 2 Fan
Aug 1, 2003
23,214
18,238
I see Lowe as a true survivor. I would bet he let Katz stamp his name on that decision. Lowe would just be sticking his neck out unnecessarily by being the guy pushing hard for Yak by himself. We all know Lowe is only interested in keep his sweet job at this point.
 

Mc5RingsAndABeer

5-14-6-1
May 25, 2011
20,184
1,385
Except Yakupov isn't our best option on the PP. Ryan Smyth who is arguably one of the worst options on the PP according to fans has scored as many goals as Yakupov this season on the PP. This despite the fact that he has played roughly 16 less minutes on the PP this season then Yakupov. On top of that Yakupov has not scored on the PP since Nov 21. I know if I was coaching I'd think long and hard about sending him out, especially if he's not doing what's asked of him during the game.

He SHOULD be the best option on the PP. He's got one of, if not the, best shots on the team. The fact that Krueger was able to utilize him properly in his rookie season demonstrates that.

The fact that the Oilers can't utilize him properly is partially his fault - he just isn't a versatile player. However, that doesn't absolve coaching staff of their failure to make him productive, especially when he was so productive last season.
 

Supermassive

HISS, HISS
Feb 19, 2007
14,612
1,090
Sherwood Park
He SHOULD be the best option on the PP. He's got one of, if not the, best shots on the team. The fact that Krueger was able to utilize him properly in his rookie season demonstrates that.

The fact that the Oilers can't utilize him properly is partially his fault - he just isn't a versatile player. However, that doesn't absolve coaching staff of their failure to make him productive, especially when he was so productive last season.

Yakupov padded his stats late last season - I wouldn't give Krueger too much credit for developing him.

Yak is missing a lot of what it takes to be a strong PP option. Covering on defense, sculling the blue line, getting open, cycling, going to the net. He's too unpolished right now.

I think the 4th line and some "reward time" suits him just fine. We can't give him quality time simply because he might otherwise bolt. The right move is to bring him along slowly.
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
36,057
16,497
You're right, all McKenzie says is "higher authority".

https://twitter.com/TSNBobMcKenzie/statuses/386716521780609024

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie

To answer @FriedgeHNIC's on air question, re: Yakupov vs Murray, and I suspect he knew answer: Yes, majority of EDM scouts wanted Murray.


https://twitter.com/TSNBobMcKenzie/statuses/386717253430833152

@TSNBobMcKenzie

Decision to take Yakupov over Murray came from a higher authority. That's not indictment of decision, only saying how it was arrived at.

there's another rumor out there. That we wanted to take Murray but Justin Schultz' agent contacted us and told us not to bother. In other words, Schultz might not have signed with us if we selected Murray.

Murray is not on the same level of Seth Jones. He's not so great that it makes the Yakupov pick look bad. If it's true about Schultz then it was a win-win. It might not look that way today but we will see it some day.
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
36,057
16,497
Yakupov padded his stats late last season - I wouldn't give Krueger too much credit for developing him.

Yak is missing a lot of what it takes to be a strong PP option. Covering on defense, sculling the blue line, getting open, cycling, going to the net. He's too unpolished right now.

Yakupov gives up possession on the PP. That's his major flaw and it destroys a PP's effectiveness. Hemsky has struggled with the same problem his whole career. He's better now but it took time.
 

Klimando Kostani

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
2,712
874
Victoria
He SHOULD be the best option on the PP. He's got one of, if not the, best shots on the team. The fact that Krueger was able to utilize him properly in his rookie season demonstrates that.

The fact that the Oilers can't utilize him properly is partially his fault - he just isn't a versatile player. However, that doesn't absolve coaching staff of their failure to make him productive, especially when he was so productive last season.

You're right he is proven to be successful when used properly and I'll be honest when I say it looked like other players weren't ready to give him the puck at times on the pp when he was on the first line pp.

After this season, if our coach has a plan, purpose, and achievable goal with this experiment, I think we are going to have a much better and more versatile Nail Yakupov at the end of this season and going in to next.
 

Tarus

Registered User
Jun 22, 2006
9,421
4,477
Edmonton
yeah, i've heard that reported, but nowhere have i heard it mentioned that katz was the one who over-ruled the decision... i have always taken it to mean tambo or lowe... i could be wrong i suppose

at any point, it most certainly is not common-knowledge that katz was the one who did this... heck, its only rumor and speculation that an "over-rule" happened at all

Don't think it was Tambo

Stauffer implied shortly after Mactavish was hired as GM that Tambo was overruled on the pick, and was essentially a lame duck GM from that point forward.
 

belair

Jay Woodcroft Unemployment Stance
Apr 9, 2010
38,626
21,805
Canada
Regardless of what decision was made at that draft, a large majority of posters on this board would have wanted Tambellini strung from the highest rafter had Murray been taken over Yakupov. He was the clear pick at the time.

All of the discussion regarding the 'higher ups' making the decision is stupid at this point in time. And unless Ryan Murray is the second coming of Niklas Lidstrom, it shouldn't be an issue at all.
 

McJadeddog

Registered User
Sep 25, 2003
20,237
5,173
Regina, Saskatchewan
Regardless of what decision was made at that draft, a large majority of posters on this board would have wanted Tambellini strung from the highest rafter had Murray been taken over Yakupov. He was the clear pick at the time.

All of the discussion regarding the 'higher ups' making the decision is stupid at this point in time. And unless Ryan Murray is the second coming of Niklas Lidstrom, it shouldn't be an issue at all.

yakupov was the correct pick at the time, and he is still the correct pick
 

Mentallydull

Registered User
Jul 3, 2008
3,257
28
Oil Country
Yakupov padded his stats late last season - I wouldn't give Krueger too much credit for developing him.

Yak is missing a lot of what it takes to be a strong PP option. Covering on defense, sculling the blue line, getting open, cycling, going to the net. He's too unpolished right now.

I think the 4th line and some "reward time" suits him just fine. We can't give him quality time simply because he might otherwise bolt. The right move is to bring him along slowly.

I've never understood the whole "padding the stats" argument.

Points are points, they're not worth any less in a blow-out game, an empty-netter, or meaningless games at the end of the season.

All of them require effort/skill/a bit of luck to obtain, saying otherwise is just trying to illegitimately downplay someone's success.
 

sepHF

Patreeky
Feb 12, 2010
15,777
3,486
Horak has been pretty underwhelming hopefully this experiment doesn't last too long.
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
17,901
13,387
Edmonton
Murray was the pick that the Oilers needed but Yakupov was the best player in the draft. Any team selecting first overall would have drafted Yakupov. The only thing that would have made sense was to swap picks with Columbus and then take Murray. The Oilers will still end up getting a pretty good defenceman when they trade Yakupov this summer. My guess is he goes to NYI for Reinhart +.
 

syz

[1, 5, 6, 14]
Jul 13, 2007
29,282
13,033
Murray will be lucky to be the 4th or 5th best d-man from his draft.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad