McGarnagle
Yes.
- Aug 5, 2017
- 28,968
- 38,802
The thing with Kulikov is that if we acquire him, everyone is going to flip out with Jack Edwards pronouncing his name Kul-yiii-kov every shift.
@Montecristo in the last thread you said Palmieri giving you 13 ES goals wasn't a big deal...you realize that's actually really solid even strength production, right?
since 15/16 he's the 12th ranked RW in the NHL in 5v5 goals. That's infinitely better than anything we've had in our top 6 outside of the big 4 in the last 5 years.
Well at least Jack will have to finally ask him how to pronounce his nameThe thing with Kulikov is that if we acquire him, everyone is going to flip out with Jack Edwards pronouncing his name Kul-yiii-kov every shift.
Where would we be without u ?I shouldn't be surprised that on the message board where people think 700+ point David Krejci is a 3rd line center that I also need to convince people that Kyle Palmieri is good, but here I am.
when the NHL changes the rules to award games to the team with players you notice the most instead of players that score the most goals then I'll agree.palmieri helps. Hes a solid 2nd line right wing. I just dont think he is good enough to get the bruins a stanley cup. He brings little to none in terms of playoff pedigree or experience. Hes been a big fish in a small pond with nj and anaheim. His ice time will drop in boston. Id rather someone like miles wood honestly at least he impacts the game without scoring. Boston needs scoring for sure, but they also need some energy. A more prototypical 4th line could help that and wood is a great candidate to boost a 4th line. Palmieri to me i never seem to notice on the ice
This place has posters who have been trying to ship out David Krejci for the last 10 years. It will never change. Hell Krejci will be retired and people will still be irrationally pissed off when you utter his name.I shouldn't be surprised that on the message board where people think 700+ point David Krejci is a 3rd line center that I also need to convince people that Kyle Palmieri is good, but here I am.
What does NJ accept for Palmeiri from
Boston
I don’t know. Tbh, I don’t think we’re getting him. I’m just saying in general for people who don’t think he’d move the needle. I think he does or any acquisition like him. It strengthens your lineups scoring depth.
Sweeney generally makes a trade no one is talking about. The rumours ever really pan out do they?I don’t know. Tbh, I don’t think we’re getting him. I’m just saying in general for people who don’t think he’d move the needle. I think he does or any acquisition like him. It strengthens your lineups scoring depth.
I don’t know. Tbh, I don’t think we’re getting him. I’m just saying in general for people who don’t think he’d move the needle. I think he does or any acquisition like him. It strengthens your lineups scoring depth.
On top of that, he is likely the best level of player Boston is going to add. Who else is there that will not require creating another giant hole to acquire? You get past the Palmieri level player and you are giving up some serious assets.
He does just that, but him alone, I wonder if its enough, but I guess it all depends on how the cookie crumbles.
I agree though I don't think he's coming here. Islanders would be my guess.
I'm calling it.
Kulikov and Palmieri to Boston.
When is the deadline anyway?
Your deal keeps getting bigger and better, In twenty are they adding Hughes ?I just read Rask travelling with the team....
Kulikov Wood and Palmieri to Boston. This would make this fan very happy.
I just read Rask travelling with the team....
Kulikov Wood and Palmieri to Boston. This would make this fan very happy.
Hall is better then Palmieri. Hes available pay extra and get him.
YesThe Lucic pick was an interesting one. Bradley was diagnosed with cancer and had surgery, which kept him home in Vancouver. He got to watch Lucic, who played for the Giants, for the better part of the season and fell in love with him. I’ve read that Bradley tried to convince Gorton to take him at 37.