Del Preston
Registered User
- Mar 8, 2013
- 63,171
- 78,954
Gotta get that 4th line out there in the final minute to defend the lead.All I learned tonight is Todd really doesn't know when his players are playing well or not.
Gotta get that 4th line out there in the final minute to defend the lead.All I learned tonight is Todd really doesn't know when his players are playing well or not.
The NHL really needs to get it together, if you have a camera angle showing the puck over the line, you need to show it to the ****ing fans, it's ****ing 2018 for ****s sakes.
I’d love an answer for this too. Right now the best I can come up with is because it’s a California team playing the Oilers. Would have been interesting to hear the league come up with an answer for that question if the Kings would have tied the game up in that final 9.8 seconds.Anyone care to explain why they got to replay 9.8 seconds after the goal was disallowed? How does that give them back the time?
They didn't, they let the game play out aaaand then decided to look at it. Strange that they would call it a goal after the game was over the first time. But if there was no controversy it wouldn't be the NHL...lol
It would be a lot less fishy if they showed us this camera angle. We don’t know what those guys are smoking in the war room. Unless you know, do you work there or something?Again the embedded crossbar cameras
What do you mean putting Matt "Own Worst Enemy" Benning out in the final minutes is a bad idea?Gotta get that 4th line out there in the final minute to defend the lead.
NHL starting to be as legitimate as Italian soccer.Again the embedded crossbar cameras
lp, lp, , lk, hp to you.Good job. OoT teams were following this one and hoping your team could pull this out. Gave us a scare near the end but you went Right-A-Down-Right-A-Down and dodged that bullet.
No signal. The play kept going until the clock ran out.Question:
On the original call (prior to any review), did the referee call it a goal or not?
I’d love an answer for this too. Right now the best I can come up with is because it’s a California team playing the Oilers. Would have been interesting to hear the league come up with an answer for that question if the Kings would have tied the game up in that final 9.8 seconds.
no, the play carried on until the clock ran out.Question:
On the original call (prior to any review), did the referee call it a goal or not?
No they let clock run out entirely no hand ever went up on the playQuestion:
On the original call (prior to any review), did the referee call it a goal or not?
It would be a lot less fishy if they showed us this camera angle. We don’t know what those guys are smoking in the war room. Unless you know, do you work there or something?
I seem to remember at least one person that said that trade was bad. Who was it?!?Cammalleri had three points.
Ouch, LA, ouch.
So you do work for the war room then?It's NOT a production feed going through the broadcaster system
Yep. Time expired in regular play.OMG I THOUGHT OILER FANS WERE INTELLIGENT.
THE PUCK CROSSED THE GOAL LINE WITH 9.8 SECONDS LEFT THAT IS WHERE THE PLAY STOPPED.
OMG YOU PEOPLE
It's NOT a production feed going through the broadcaster system
That doesn’t make sense though. The end result of the play was no goal. Those 9.8 seconds had already been played. The only way those played 9.8 seconds doesn’t count was if a good goal is scored.Cause they ruled the goal cross the line so it was a goal so time gets added back to where it happened. Then it was dissallowe for goalie interference.