No one is generational these titles are bs
Is Barkov on the brink of generational status?
No, he isn't. Barkov's good but he's over rated if you ask me, def not generational.
He is not better than Gretzky, the baby boomer generation is a lock.So what about Bobby Orr? He's a franchise player or?
Why's that Pejorative Slured lion on his chest piercing its own head, though?Better stop talking about Barkov.
He is literally the last guy to deserve the HFBoards Hate Train treatment, makes me a sad puppy
Reality is not 2D, it is meant to illustrate an object being behind something.Why's that ******ed lion on his chest piercing its own head, though?
Have you asked that on Colorado boards? I read some interesting stuff about MacKinnon there.Why can’t we be cool with just letting great players be great players? Why does everybody gotta be the goat?
Meh, sure looks like it's drunk on Koskenkorva, tripped on one sword and accidently stabbed itself with the otherReality is not 2D, it is meant to illustrate an object being behind something.
Why's that ******ed lion on his chest piercing its own head, though?
No, but he isn't any less generational than Matthews or Eichel
LOL. Trocheck and Huberdeau are close to Barkov in points only, everything else goes to Barkov. Not saying Barkov = Crosby/Gretzky tho.He is generational only if you measure it by how overrated a player is. He is closer to Trochek/Huberdeau level than Crosby/Gretzky. Fast becoming the most overrated player in hockey history.
When Barkov was Matthews' age he had 59 points in 66 games, compared to Matthews' 50 points in 53 games. Factor in defensive play and one could easily argue Barkov was ahead of Matthews at the same age.I think this whole generational thing is stupid because having 10+ generational players at once defeats the meaning of it, but for arguments sake how is a player who is in his fifth season who has yet to surpass the rookie point totals of Matthews or even remotely approach his goals scored in a season not any less generational?