$1.35 million take-home a year is a LOT of f***ing money.
Is that how it works?Isn't like baseball or other sport where you pay the tax rate of the state you play the game, so 41 games + sen's game at that Ontario rate and the same for Tampa, that would reduce the gap a bit I feel like, but it would still be quite a bit. But exchange rate can sometime do a lot of good in the other direction.
has for the general question, now that the mass of player get roughly a percentage of the league revenues I imagine they would care way less than when maybe Kariya-Selanne taking a one year at a low price deal with the Avs, Mario Lemieux paying himself only 2M a year when he was in part the owner or Brodeur did not use an agent, but even in all those example they did not veto, putting pressure on them seem possible but veto seem out of reach.
Florida Tax calculator for Kucherov's $9,500,000
View attachment 443254
Florida Income Tax Calculator - SmartAsset
What Kucherov would take home in Toronto:
View attachment 443255
https://www.wealthsimple.com/en-ca/tool/tax-calculator/
$1.35 million take-home a year is a LOT of f***ing money.
Is that how it works?
Stamkos Kucherov and Hedman did exactly that. All 3 did a solid to Tampa. Nobody cared at the NHLPA.
Is that how it works?
Each player thinks about their own situation. The top guys can afford to take less if they wish.Players for your team don't care as much as you want them to about 'keeping the team together by taking a steep discount'. I'm sorry.
I mean, I love hockey. But there are no violins played for millionaires playing this game. I think when you are talking star money, I don't know how much of a life style change it is for a guy making 7 million vs. the guy making 11. Obviously 11 is more (especially over the course of a 6-8 year contract), but unless they are living an extremely extravagant lifestyle, I don't think Pastrnak (making 6.66 a year) is struggling and angry over his choices versus a guy like Marner making 11.I have to imagine other plays wouldn't be pleased at their own value being dragged down if, say, MacKinnon and Landeskog took massive underpayments to keep the core together.
When you get good enough to warrant a big contract you will be a ufa when that time comes around. So your choice if you wish to remain with that club.I mean, I love hockey. But there are no violins played for millionaires playing this game. I think when you are talking star money, I don't know how much of a life style change it is for a guy making 7 million vs. the guy making 11. Obviously 11 is more (especially over the course of a 6-8 year contract), but unless they are living an extremely extravagant lifestyle, I don't think Pastrnak (making 6.66 a year) is struggling and angry over his choices versus a guy like Marner making 11.
You are definitely right players take cuts to try and win and/or play where they want. But $2M when you're already making $11M is quite different than the initial example of taking a 50% cut from $10 to $5.Obviously there's no way of truly calculating this, but $5 mil with a far greater chance of a Cup win (more money saved, to improve the team in other ways), over $10 mil with less flexible surrounding cast and - quite possibly - inferior team?
Not as cut and dry as just picking the higher number.
To you and I, sure, since we're not pro athletes and we'll never see this kind of money. I would think that a pro athlete gives it more thought.
Look at Tavares, he turned down an extra $2 million or so, per season, offered by San Jose, because he wanted to sign in Toronto.
That kind of thing happens every year.
do you know how much is the difference between 20 million and 25 million when your career might end at any minute.
A lot.
Well thanks captain obvious, I am referring to additional contracts and their relative short lifespan as professional athletes. Their window to earn money is much smaller, better to get paid while you can.Lol no. Unless the players walks away and says they never want to play again, their salary is guaranteed.
Pasta's first 2 seasons were excellent as well, while he wasn't a PPG player he was consistently making the type of plays that only the leagues premier players make, it was apparent that he was going to continue to improve on his 34G/36A season.
In the usa for nfl, basketball, baseball yes:
Income Taxes For Pro Athletes Are Reminder Of How Complicated U.S. Tax Code Is
Athletes file taxes not only in their home state but also in every state—and some cities—in which they play. Not every state uses the same calculation to determine what portion of an athlete’s income to tax, and some use different calculations based on the sport. For example, Pennsylvania taxes baseball, basketball and hockey players on the ratio games in the state over total games played, including pre- and postseason, but they tax football players based on days worked in the state over total days worked. Michigan uses the same method but excludes the preseason. Most other states use the days worked method. Arizona uses that method but excludes days worked in the pre-season (otherwise MLB would be shopping for a new spring training home).
A baseball players posted is pay stub:
Could be wrong but I think hockey is quite similar, so during a covid year Canadian player paid Canadian type of tax all year's long, I imagine. Has you see the athlete pay tax in every state he played games during is pay period.
The NHLPA would never do that. It's up to the players to have their own balance of "money vs. wanting to play for a franchise." What I find sickening are the players who come out and say, "That's up to my agent -- he handles all of that" as if they have no say. You pay your agent to facilitate your best interests, not dictate your life, where you play, and how much money you make.
Well thanks captain obvious, I am referring to additional contracts and their relative short lifespan as professional athletes. Their window to earn money is much smaller, better to get paid while you can.