Proposal: Would any team take the Lucic contract for multiple picks?

Status
Not open for further replies.

scotchtapejr

Registered User
Dec 28, 2018
287
373
Lets say Oilers were able to get

2nd for Chiasson
2nd for Kassian
3rd for Talbot
3rd for Petrovic
4th for Brodziak
4th for Gravel

Would you/any team take 6 draft picks to take on Lucics contract with no retention?

More? Less?

At what point does stacking a draft in a teams favor and increasing the odds of drafting stars worth taking on a bad contract of that magnitude?

Please be kind/gentle to me. This is my first thread here. Your responses couls crush me.
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
29,441
30,914
No. Those players likely won't return that. Kassian and Petrovic mainly.

Even if all those players did, you're looking at late picks in all those rounds. Not worth it for anyone.
 

ole ole

Registered User
Oct 7, 2017
11,937
6,021
Lets say Oilers were able to get

2nd for Chiasson
2nd for Kassian
3rd for Talbot
3rd for Petrovic
4th for Brodziak
4th for Gravel

Would you/any team take 6 draft picks to take on Lucics contract with no retention?

More? Less?

At what point does stacking a draft in a teams favor and increasing the odds of drafting stars worth taking on a bad contract of that magnitude?

Please be kind/gentle to me. This is my first thread here. Your responses couls crush me.
Only if the Oilers retain 50%
 

scotchtapejr

Registered User
Dec 28, 2018
287
373
No. Those players likely won't return that. Kassian and Petrovic mainly.

Even if all those players did, you're looking at late picks in all those rounds. Not worth it for anyone.

Im pretty sure the Oilers could get a 2nd for Kassian with some retention, especially from a smaller team worried about Winnipeg, Boston, or even VGK/Reeves.

Same with Petrovic.
 

AndreRoy

Registered User
Jan 3, 2018
4,466
3,591
Nobody’s taking on Lucic’s contract without either an incentive that will hurt to give up or a cap dump that’s almost as bad coming back your way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bruins4thecup65

xtra

Registered User
May 19, 2002
8,323
4,765
Vancouver
Visit site
Lets say Oilers were able to get

2nd for Chiasson
2nd for Kassian
3rd for Talbot
3rd for Petrovic
4th for Brodziak
4th for Gravel

Would you/any team take 6 draft picks to take on Lucics contract with no retention?

More? Less?

At what point does stacking a draft in a teams favor and increasing the odds of drafting stars worth taking on a bad contract of that magnitude?

Please be kind/gentle to me. This is my first thread here. Your responses couls crush me.

If you could give up that and a first you might get a competent gm to do it. Or just call Benning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bruins4thecup65

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
16,962
6,589
Halifax
Lets say Oilers were able to get

2nd for Chiasson
2nd for Kassian
3rd for Talbot
3rd for Petrovic
4th for Brodziak
4th for Gravel

Would you/any team take 6 draft picks to take on Lucics contract with no retention?

More? Less?

At what point does stacking a draft in a teams favor and increasing the odds of drafting stars worth taking on a bad contract of that magnitude?

Please be kind/gentle to me. This is my first thread here. Your responses couls crush me.


Sorry but most of those returns are a dream .
 

Michoulicious

Registered User
Dec 9, 2014
6,879
7,246
Lets say Oilers were able to get

2nd for Chiasson
2nd for Kassian
3rd for Talbot
3rd for Petrovic
4th for Brodziak
4th for Gravel

Would you/any team take 6 draft picks to take on Lucics contract with no retention?

More? Less?

At what point does stacking a draft in a teams favor and increasing the odds of drafting stars worth taking on a bad contract of that magnitude?

Please be kind/gentle to me. This is my first thread here. Your responses couls crush me.

In what universe Kassian gets a 2nd round pick... or any of those players get what is suggested? Anyways, all those picks added together amount to around a mid 1st round pick, and I doubt any team takes Lucic for a mid first round pick .
 

Captain Mountain

Formerly Captain Wolverine
Jun 6, 2010
20,437
14,013
Did you think Brian Boyle was going to fetch a second? Because i didnt.

Brian Boyle is a center. Its not the first time a good 4th line C that can play up has gotten a 2nd at the deadline. Its also not the first time a rental Brian Boyle has returned a 2nd.

I'm honestly shocked that you wouldn't predict it. But I note that none of those guys on your list are a two-way center that scores.
 

780il

edm
May 29, 2018
12,622
14,463
Edmonton AB
Your player valuations in OP are off imo:

Chiasson: late 2nd or a 3rd
Talbot: 3rd
Kassian : 4th/5th
Petrovic: 4th/5th
Brodziak: won't be moved probably
Gravel: 3rd/4th

No, no one would take Lucic for a bunch of 3rd/4th/5th rounders.

Personally, I'd be willing to give someone Pulju + 2nd + another pick (3rd or 4th) to take on Lucic and except a small 1 or 2 year dump in return. For example, Lucic + Puljujarvi + 2nd + 3rd for Panik.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,386
13,800
Folsom
Nobody is going to take that contract for those kinds of picks no matter the quantity. Now if you retain 50% then you'll probably get some takers since 3 mil for those picks at least seems more realistic for the situation but the odds of even that happening are still next to zero. I think Edmonton will have to hold on to him and hope that a compliance buyout is part of the next CBA.
 

scotchtapejr

Registered User
Dec 28, 2018
287
373
In what universe Kassian gets a 2nd round pick... or any of those players get what is suggested? Anyways, all those picks added together amount to around a mid 1st round pick, and I doubt any team takes Lucic for a mid first round pick .

2 2nds and a 3rd would probably get you a mid round first. Between 18-24 is pretty likely imo. Especially in a weak 2019 draft class. Teams would appreciate more bullets.

I believe any team dreading facing Ryan Reeves in the first round would be willing to pay a premium for Kassian, with retention of course.

I believe any team facing Winnipeg would/should consider it.

Ive seen how he can affect a series in the playoffs.

I believe he can get a 3rd as is, a 2nd with 50% retention.

I believe Petrovic gets a 3rd from someone like Pittsburgh, also with 50% retention.

Thinking about it now, if I were Ottawa or Arizona. Id take the trade and then retain 50% in another trade for more picks. Even a third.
 

YotesFan47

Registered User
Jun 16, 2012
4,165
2,086
Phoenix, Arizona USA
Paging John Chayka...
Shhhh, he might actually catch wind of this. :laugh:

In all seriousness, I don't think we could afford to take him on and even attempt to be competitive. Maybe if there was 50% retention and we got to send a "dump" of our own back with a shorter contract we could find a way to make it work but there is really no incentive for the Coyotes to do that. We would need to be chasing one of your bigger names where Lucic @50% was the add to make the deal happen and you guys got actual value back in return, not just cap savings.
 

cwede

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 1, 2010
9,800
7,671
offer NYR Lucic, with Bear, Maksimov, Kesslring, and 2d'20
and take back Smith with retention and 2/3 D and F prospects or young players(not top 4 D or top 4 F prospects)

dammm that Lucic deal is endless (4 more x$6M)
but by offering NYR a bit of Cap balance, and prospects that meet need, you might find common ground
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad