This was a thought I had about the game. Middle of the 2nd it took on a proper NHL flow.
Blashill and Co. are remaining VERY positive. Z also felt they did much better things overall than previous games. They played poor vs CAR, did some better things to build upon vs MON and into Edmonton. I can relate to this line of thinking. Like Pavel's wish-list faults were addressed and improved last game. They attempted 75 shots and only 28 made it to the net- there are obvious bright spots.
I agree with most who say Wings must inevitably go through a rough patch learning their way without Babcock. It does seem like a new era to me. I'm enjoying it because the team feels different, there is an excitement to the players AND Blashill guiding this ship.
I think Blash is ahead of the critics here. Realistically assessing the data we all watch the Wings are responding as best they can. Stating Monday that players time will not be as equal to each other as in the first games. Now switching up the D pairings (meaning moving Big-E to lower spot)... a change fans have been begging for years Blashill may be willing to make. He has to work with this roster. Speaking of, how soon until the Holland firing threads begin to re-emerge?
Someone said a few games ago that fans got overly confident in the pre-season and starting 3-0. I had also posted HF was not going to be pretty if and when we lose. There is a looong season ahead there will be some ups and down and guaranteed a few surprises. I still disagree with this attitude that the Wings should easily stomp all "bottom-feeders" who are ******* lottery teams. Sorry to have to say it again but it isn't 2002. The cliche that any team can win is becoming more true every season in the NHL.