The Purpose of an Overage Year is to provide the player with an extra year of development while allowing a team to benefit from the leadership such a player can provide. For some like forward Aaron Luchuk that translates into unprecedented offensive prowess as they can physically match up with the league, some like Slater Doggett come in and provide excellent leadership and offer themselves in whatever capacity help the team, some like Sean Allen provide defensive strength without necessarily offering much offensively. Usually the offensive defenseman is developing internally (unable to find the spitfires trading for one). Championships can be won with the best of the best of overagers, but for a team that is rebuilding, or is still building up the top overagers are an expensive frivolity.
Incze, Stephenson, Garagan, Purboo, Boka.
On a rebuilding team I would argue that the overager is there to support or provide what is otherwise missing from the core of the team.
If Medina and Piiroinen are not ready to carry the starting goalie's load then Incze may be a necessity, otherwise he should be traded to allow him a chance to play somewhere.
Stephenson may be a defensive defenseman suitable as an overager IF he has continued to develop in the offseason. Unless he provides something we need and do not have available in a younger player then he should be moved to allow him a chance to play somewhere.
Garagan a left shot left wing and Boka a right shot right wing or possible center do not provide offense. Their utility to the team resides in their ability to provide a solid defensive game and flexibility by moving up and down the lineup - if that does not suit them (ie. would cause dressing room ego issues) then it would be better to move them to allow them a chance to play elsewhere.
Purboo does seem to have an offensive upside, but his strength also seems to be found on the powerplay in front of the opposition net. Keeping him may necessitate using him on the first powerplay unit and the third or fourth line. As an OA Purboo may become an elite offensive weapon - of extreme value to a team making a run.
Any of the overage candidates could remain or be moved - depending on our teams needs and the needs of other teams in the league.
As to the development of our players, I do not believe that it is always up to the head coach to decide who gets focussed upon. In fact with an owner manager it is likely that the hired coach is told whose development to prioritize.
IF Frasca has requested a trade to be closer to home we should attempt to do it - he is young and full of potential but an unhappy homesick player is a teenager first and an asset second. He was blocked here with other older left handed shots ahead of him on the depth charts - had he been a right hand shot he would likely have seen more ice.
There have been some calls to move Douglas and with them I can agree - move him off the right wing where he struggles - he looked fine at both center and left wing.
I'm not sure if we realize how much injuries hurt last year. Louka Henault and Grayson Ladd (lead the team in +/-) were fine even when matched against top lines from other teams (until Ladd's injury). That allowed Nathan Staios and Connor Corcoran, Sean Allen and Thomas Stephenson to not have to draw that assignment. Sean Allen has graduated, so I'm expecting a Dylan Robinson or James Jodoin to be inserted into the lineup. If the six younger guys all develop as we hope then OA Stephenson may become expendible.
Hopefully Johnston and Zito are able to begin the year on the fourth line and move up the lineup as they develop.