Wouldn't you like to see the Spreadsheet on Babcock?
Might even have information on his most recent 10 years as head coach?
What if it isn't coaching, and its the fact that Leafs have been cap spending themselves out of competitiveness?
1/2 the Leafs salary cap is spent on just 4 players .. If JT is out that puts the Leafs down $10 mil in player personnel available when replaced by $700 Jason Spezza.
If the AM + MM + WN simply float around and don't factor in the score in a game in a major way that means you have a $40 mil Leafs balance remaining roster vs an $80 mil roster of the opposition.
If you play Boston on the night and their top line combined takes $19.6 mil and they score 2-3 goals while keeping Matthews and Marner in check that means in order for the Leafs to win the game they need their depth Kerfoot, Mikheyev, Gauthier etc etc to make up the difference offensively and score 3-4 goals from the bottom 1/2 your roster and remaining cap, while their backup goalie is in net to boot.
How many nights when AM and MM are invisible are we expected to beat a strong team under these cap $$ allocation disadvantages? Its like a glorified AHL team (with mostly cap min players) taking on an NHL team roster, and thus the odds of success are not good.
In games were AM+MM+JT score and combined for multiple goals Leafs odds of winning are increased, and in games where hey're held in check or outscored by the oppositions top players the deck is stacked against them they will win. Seeing as those 3 top players are essentially PPG players on the season that means also statistically in games where they have multi-point games there also going to be offset by Zero point games to remain PPG players statistically over the course of 82 games.
The MATH not the coaching is going to play the biggest part in Leafs season results and standings.