Jonathan Toews.
/thread
ANY MANY MORE
Another fun Datsyuk highlight.
Seeing him as a non-fighter (5'11" 194 lbs) holding his own against mega-tool Perry (6'3" 210 lbs).
Watching the other highlights, he always seemed to know the exact best moment for a stick lift. He was seriously like the Harlem Globetrotters on ice.
There is no comparison. Mcdavid won the scoring race by 11 points. Datsyuks best offensive season he lost by 15 points. When Kane won last year he won it by 17 points.
We are talking about 32 and 26 point gaps between datsyuk relative to peers and offensive greats like mcdavid and kane. There is simply no offensive comparison. Its just datsyuk romanticism taking highlights and stretching to assume his production was at that level, it wasnt. And in his 97 point seasons, an absurd number of the points came on the power play. Just fortunate to be on a power play with lidstrom and be in a distributor role.
I hope there's another like him in the future, he was certainly a rare and unique talent that was pretty much electrifying every time he was on the ice. Opposing coaches must have been happy to see him retire.
To think that the Wings have produced guys like Datsyuk, Fedorov, Lidstrom, Zetterberg, and Yzerman is pretty incredible.
Not many guys have highlights when matched up against the defensive nightmare of Bergeron/Chara like the one you just posted.
Here's a couple more typical games from him while against Boston:
"my guy couldn't do it, so kane and mcdavid couldn't either" lol, kane and mcdavid have posted truly dominant offensive seasons, datsyuk didn't come close to the leader across his best seasons, not even close.
106 points when goals per game were 2.71 and power play opps per game were 3.1 vs
97 points when goals per game were 2.91 and power play opps per game were 4.2
not even close
trying to equate datsyuks offense to guys in another offensive tier like kane and mcdavid is attempting to fit skills and production to a player that simply didn't have them.
"my guy couldn't do it, so kane and mcdavid couldn't either" lol, kane and mcdavid have posted truly dominant offensive seasons, datsyuk didn't come close to the leader across his best seasons, not even close.
106 points when goals per game were 2.71 and power play opps per game were 3.1 vs
97 points when goals per game were 2.91 and power play opps per game were 4.2
not even close
trying to equate datsyuks offense to guys in another offensive tier like kane and mcdavid is attempting to fit skills and production to a player that simply didn't have them.
I think Kucherov is the new Datsyuk
Jonathan Toews.
/thread
Wow, you posted actual stats instead of a massively flawed comparison. Glad we were able to move past that terrible argument.
I have little doubt that Datsyuk could have won an Art Ross if he was told to focus only on offense and ignore defensive responsibilities like Kane. It is certainly arguable and is obviously close, despite your flawed arguments.
Lol, another made up hypothetical. He could have done this if that, kane and mcdavid couldnt have dine this if that blah blah.
The reality is kane and mcdavid have dominant art ross seasons where they put up huge gaps between them and 2nd place. In datsyuks best offensive seasons (which absurdly are being compared to actual offensive wizards because "youtubez tho") he didnt even sniff the leader finishing 15 or 16 points behind. Nowhere close.
Yet he had a better pt/60 than everyone in the league for those who played a majority of the season. Goes to show you, that deployment and ice times are a HUGE HUGE factor, not only that but his defensive mentality which affects his position and play contribute to a less offensive approach.
Not sure why you keep mentioning defense. I like two way players and agree that overall contribution is what matters. I was replying specifically to posts severely exaggerating datsyuk by saying he had the offense of kane and the defense of bergeron combined.
Hardly.
In reality he is on the spectrum of great two way players, in the same tier as toews kopitar etc but with more power play points (both due to more pps in general and being tied to the hip to lidstrom and a great power play all the time). Somewhat worse in the playoffs than those guys as well, just one cup as a top liner and lower playoff production than those guys.
Not sure why you keep mentioning defense. I like two way players and agree that overall contribution is what matters. I was replying specifically to posts severely exaggerating datsyuk by saying he had the offense of kane and the defense of bergeron combined.
Hardly.
In reality he is on the spectrum of great two way players, in the same tier as toews kopitar etc but with more power play points (both due to more pps in general and being tied to the hip to lidstrom and a great power play all the time). Somewhat worse in the playoffs than those guys as well, just one cup as a top liner and lower playoff production than those guys.
The post above showed it perfectly. Again, look at actual stats like above and not worthless stats without context like who won the Art Ross in seasons with weak competition. Kane has his peak against Crosby, Malkin and Ovechkin peaks and he has zero Art Rosses.
Lol because crosby, malkin, and ovechkin were old men last year? Many many posts stating all those guys have been at or near their best recently, and are all within their athletic primes. The reality is the NHL has changed moderately, with a decline in power plays and lower, more evenly distributed scoring. That is what made Kane and Mcdavids seasons stand out that much more relative to their peers and relative to Datsyuks best seasons offensively.