I kind of look at what is best for Scheifele as opposed to what is best for Kane. I think Scheifele may have better success with players like Wheeler and Buff that can play a cycle game more of a patient game. I don't want to limit Scheifele to just being a setup man for Kane.
Kane and Burmi could create a lot chemistry together if given the chance, as was mentioned during Kane's 30 goal season his best stretches were with Burmi
Having Burmi back would give us the luxury of experimenting though on who fits better with Kane and others, so I sure hope it happens
Scheifele can and does shoot the puck very very well that is not an issue for me and he is the C , so the wingers will play to his game , he won't nor would feel he needs to change his game for Kane imo . I see Scheifele , Wheeler and Kane as the best trio , for themselves and for the Jets , not that has to be set in stone mind you , but best for their development and production and thus best for team results.
I don't agree re the a lot of chemistry comment , that season was more on Evander's ability and Kane rather than the success being brought out by Burmistrov. I do agree having him back is a plus and allows for seeing what works best for the team overall though . Until he proves otherwise at least for me , Burmistrov is complimentary piece not an essential core piece. Nothing wrong with being a good third line part , but banking on him being a plus top 6 now is too much at this time at least how I see it.
If he comes back I would view it as a good third line addition , if we acquire another c that can play 3C then he MAY be an option as a 2nd line wing. Nothing wrong with having him back at all , but I would temper peoples expectations for more than a complimentary piece . Let him prove he is more if that is to be .