Hawksfan2828
Registered User
I think the knee injuries slowed his development (both MCL's, one strained multiple times, one torn, before he was 20!)... but he did develop.
His D game got better to the point he was definitely a 'good' defensive player, he was always 'good' on faceoff but he became an all time great on the dot, and he turned himself into a pretty darn good PKer.
I actually think despite his 94-95 season being one many point to as his 'peak', the best he ever was was 1998-99...
as complete a player as he ever was at that point and was neck and neck with Jagr in points (in what ended up being Jagr's best ever season) up until game 60 of the year.
Pacing for over 120 points at the end of February. While playing 3 minutes a night less than Jagr!
He did not have the 'Legion of Doom' then either... Renberg was close to done and did not play much on his line, LeClair was ofc still good, but the other winger was mainly Keith Jones... with Maneluk & Zubrus getting time on that RW too.
Lindros from October 1998 to February 1999 was as dominant a hockey player as you could wish for really.
I don't know if I agree he developed his game. He clearly didn't learn that starring at the puck is a bad idea..
At any rate when it comes to HOF consideration I don't know if he did enough, then factor in injuries, his arrogant holdouts and refusals to play for a couple of teams, hold outs and the fact he had a massive flaw in not being vigilant on ice which led to his injuries - also the fact he never won anything of notability..
It's a no for me, however if everything went right for him it is very possible he would be up there with Gretzky, Lemieux, Orr etc...
Everything that could go wrong for Lindros did... Of course I find this ironic because after all he thought he was Gods gift to hockey and refused to play for a couple of teams, and of course that started in juniors...
I suppose my point is that he has more working against him than he has working for him when it comes to the HOF...