Playmaker09
Registered User
- Sep 11, 2008
- 3,359
- 1,605
Using PP-PK time I actually did some research from 2002-03 "earliest time they had the records" to this season.
Here's Montreal's rank from 2002-03 to 2008-09:
2002-03: 14’th
2003-04: 14’th
2005-06: 20’th
2006-07: 27’th
2007-08: 6’th
2008-09: 13’th
Mostly average some years were harsh "06-07" while other were great" 2007-08".
However from 09-10 to now:
2009-10: 30’th
2010-11: 30’th
2011-12: 19`th
2012-13: 1`st
2013-14: 21st
2014-15: 30th
Sure we had one good year but besides that the best year was 19'th and we were last 3 times in 6 years. I get that refing can be subject to human error and some years may be bad but come on 3 out of 6 years.
Also because I was interested I did Boston to:
2002-03: 27th
2003-04: 23rd
2005-06: 27th
2006-07: 24th
2007-08: 20th
2008-09: 18th
2009-10: 20th
2010-11: 11th
2011-12: 17th
2012-13: 30th
2013-14: 29th
2014-15: 28th
As much as I hate to admit it they don't get off easy "for penalty's. For suspensions and nut shots well?"
PPs aren't awarded, they're earned. They don't need to be evened out over the course of a game, and by extension, a season.
We haven't had enough sustained offensive pressure over the years to draw penalties at a high rate, so this doesn't surprise me at all.
As for Boston, well they're slow and play a bullying style, of course they're going to be on the wrong end of a PP-PK ranking.