Dude what are you still going on about? No one is superimposing anything. Chill tf out, no one is changing your precious draft lottery reveal
You are superimposing your expectations of what the draft lottery should be over everyone else's views on the issue. Each time someone points out the flaws in your argument or just says "I think the draft lottery is OK the way it is now." it's just "yeah, well that's just your opinion" and then a push to brush it off. But when you present an argument it's treated as if it has merit and value and deserves recognition.
This is this thread:
You: "People want and deserve a better and more exciting draft lottery reveal system!"
The people you claim to speak for: "no we don't. It's fine how it is now. Showing the lottery drawing is boring and confusing and fixing it to not be those things would likely risk its integrity and fairness"
You: "That can't be right! I'm telling you that you should want it to be better."
Everyone else: "But we don't really
want it better. Nobody wants to watch the ping-pong balls. The card thing does its job just fine. Besides, how are you making it better?"
You: "That's not my job to figure out. I'm just saying it can be better and someone else can figure out how."
Everyone else: "It kind of is your job to figure out how it can be better if you're suggesting that. Because if you don't know how then you don't even know if it's possible."
You: "Don't get bogged down in details. Just focus on making it better."
Everyone else: "But the details are how you know it IS better. And the details suggest it wouldn't be. At least not in the ways that matter. And that not enough people care to make it worth doing anything."
You: "Whoa, chill out! nobody will take away your precious lottery"
Everyone else: "but.... you just said you wanted to take it away. and refused to listen to people saying you didn't need to..."
Look, I can appreciate that you asked a question about changing the process. It's important to be able to look at things and ask "can we do this better?" but if a bunch of people say "probably not" and "even if we could there's not really a need to." then it's probably best to just accept that and move on instead of continuing to insist on speaking for everyone even as they tell you that you don't speak for them.
The lottery isn't exciting but it's not designed to be. it's designed to be practical and do its job to the best of its ability and regardless of what you think about the idea of the lottery and its impact on the draft, the setup they have does what it needs to for the lottery system in use. It's a thing to stick at the intermission of a playoff game in May and be done in 15 minutes. It doesn't need to be 10 minutes of gripping television based on watching ping-pong balls and doing complicated probabilistic math that won't appeal to anyone but the nerdiest math PhDs.
I was going to do a silly parallel idea to jazz up the draft but realized that it would probably mark this as one of those "dumb posts" where flippant sarcasm apparently becomes a disqualifier for serious consideration of its actual points so maybe I'll just stop while I'm ahead. After all, I'm pro "lottery is fine" so I must hate fun anyways.