vadim sharifijanov
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2007
- 28,784
- 16,238
... odd Clan, the Lindros's. Back when Eric was still a tadpole but causing a stir as "the next one" his parents went up to Parry Sound to meet with Bobby's mom & dad seeking advice on how they should nurture both of their boys. Doug Orr replied with "do nothing". Two word answer apparently & didnt bother to expound upon it. Do nothing at all. Let the kids have fun first of all & build character through play. I dont think Bonnie & Carl Lindros' ever quite grasped that concept demanding instead (and instilled in both boys) that the klieg lights be shone on their treasures exclusively, the rest of the cast of players on the stage to be entirely ignored. I can only assume that as Gretzky's light shone brighter, there could well have been some enmity, a certain kind of ugly & unhealthy avaricious jealousy that existed, something Gretzky & his family had been living with since he was about 8yrs old.
makes sense to me. let us not forget that mario was also not on the greatest terms with gretzky, even after the buddy moment of '87, until he wins two cups/smythes and no longer feels as much like he's chasing someone else's face of the game status.
i'm kind of glad this thread has somehow become a brett lindros thread because it's a really interesting family. and yet, it's interesting because it's so common among a certain kind of silver spoon suburban toronto hockey family with a certain kind of bay street dad (see: hodgson, chris). how many promising careers were hindered by that kind of dad? not from toronto, but mike comrie is another example. you only get so many years in the league, even if you're an all-star calibre talent; but these kids let their daddies (and agents, and sometimes these are the same guy) piss some of that away by micromanaging the conditions under which they start their careers.
but on the other hand, we have brett lindros. got every opportunity in life. it might just be sour grapes, or a distaste for that distasteful family, but my peewee coach, who told us he grew up playing with NHL guys around that age, told me brett lindros was always the least talented guy on the team. "he sucks now and he sucked then" is an exact quote. also, "but daddy made sure he got all the best icetime" (not an exact quote).
take that with a grain of salt, obviously; it's an almost 20 year old memory of what a guy who may or may not have been lying to try to impress a bunch of thirteen year-olds said. but to speculate: here's a guy who reportedly had little raw ability except for his hulking frame, but who spent his whole life going to the best camps, playing with the newest lightest equipment, working out with the best power skating instructors, playing on the best rep teams for the best coaches, getting the best icetime with the best linemates, (apparently) getting tips from paul coffey up in cottage country -- though i love the image of the lindros clan hanging out on their dock drinking beers with paul coffey and shooting the breeze about hockey and then out of nowhere carl going, "wait a minute, we're only an hour away from parry sound. screw you coffey, i'm going to orr." at a certain point, all of those advantages, but especially having a man's body before anybody else, adds up to make for a pretty dominant 16 year old junior B player (which the younger lindros was).
but what we do know is scouting reports projecting him as a sergio momesso (a guy who i loved, btw, but a guy you take in second round), we know that he looked vastly inferior to todd bertuzzi, who was a late first rounder the year before, we know that as a teenager he didn't look like he belonged either in the OHL or on the national team, and we know the results: 9th overall pick, $2.5 million starting salary with a three year term.
going through all the quotes above, it almost looks like *someone* has planted the idea that there was a demand for brett lindros, that he could have been a top five pick. because what we do see is GMs saying, "no no no, we're not trading up for that kid. are you kidding me?" but why was the question asked to them? what GMs even talked about lindros being a top ten, let alone a top five pick? it's like the lindros camp invented a demand for lindros, then tried to get desirable teams to trade up, and one sucker not only bit (don maloney, islanders) but then gave the kid a ridiculous contract-- as a point of comparison, daigle's lockout-causing rookie contract from the previous year's draft was $2.45 AAV (/5 years), pronger's was a million, i think. i can't remember for sure, but i think brett lindros had a significantly richer rookie contract than jovo, bonk, tverdovsky, or anyone else from that draft. for a project player who may or may not have had hands of stone.