Who would you have drafted? 2022 edition

[NotProkofievian]

Im not strong enough

You posted a list.

 

[Ezpz]

___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
...




I will come back and edit in 2030.

 

[David Suzuki]

1. Logan Cooley
26. Jiri Kulich
33. Jagger Firkus
62. Lane Hutson
75. Jordan Dumais
127. Cedric Guindon
130. Sergei Ivanov
162. Matthew Seminoff
194. Artyom Barbosha
216. Miguel Tourigny

After the first five picks it's total guesswork but just based on pre draft feelings and who drafted them lol.

 

[Ghetto Sangria]

1. Shane Wright
26. Jiri Kulich
33. Jagger Firkus
62. Lane Hutson
75. Vinzenz Rorher
92. Jordan Dumais
127. Jake Furlong
130. David Spacek
162. Matthew Seminoff
194. Logan Morrison
216. Ivan Zhigalov

 

[Lockin17]

Wow no love for Owen Beck in here , though it was a great pick at #33

1. Wright
13. Lekkeremaki
26. Lambert
33. Luneau/Beck
62. Odelius

 

[ginomini]

1. Wright/Nemec (preferred Nemec since after xmas, but would not have the balls to draft him)
26. Howard
33. Chesley
62. Hutson
75. Rohrer
92. Dumais

 

[Mrb1p]

1.) Shane Wright
13.) Frank Nazar
26.) Havelid/Gled
33.) Jagger Firkus
62.) Calle Odelius
66.) Lane Hutson
75.) Adam Ingram
92.) Mats Lindgren
127.) Zam Plante
130.) Vladimir Grudinin
162.) Servac Petrovsky
194.) Michael La Starza
216.) Logan Morrisson


Woof what this draft couldve been. I even manage to draft a Montrealer.

 

[ML16]

1. Juraj Slafkovsky / Simon Nemec
26. Jiri Kulich / Maveric Lamoureux
33. Noah Warren / Tristan Luneau / Jagger Firkus
62. Lane Hutson
75. Vincenz Rohrer
92. Jordan Dumais

…

My main concern with the draft is the absence of a significant RHD prospect. One of Nemec (#1 or trade down); Lamoureux (#26) or Warren / Luneau (#33) would have gone a long way in strengthening the RHD pool, a dire organizational need, especially if Petry leaves sooner than later.

 

[NotProkofievian]

1. Juraj Slafkovsky / Simon Nemec
26. Jiri Kulich / Maveric Lamoureux
33. Noah Warren / Tristan Luneau / Jagger Firkus
62. Lane Hutson
75. Vincenz Rohrer
92. Jordan Dumais

…

My main concern with the draft is the absence of a significant RHD prospect. One of Nemec (#1 or trade down); Lamoureux (#26) or Warren / Luneau (#33) would have gone a long way in strengthening the RHD pool, a dire organizational need, especially if Petry leaves sooner than later.

Love Warren as a bet. Respect the idea of taking him there.

 

[1909]

Wow no love for Owen Beck in here , though it was a great pick at #33

1. Wright
13. Lekkeremaki
26. Lambert
33. Luneau/Beck
62. Odelius

#13 would never had happen without Romanov for Dach.

 

[1909]

Now that we know what kind of 'character' Wright has, I prefer Slaf.

I would had liked Gaucher at #26. Mesar is ok. Could had been Beck.

At 33, go with a rhd like Warren , Luneau or Chesley.

The rest is fine but I do question the little Finnish D drafted in the 6th. And also better kids from the Q than Miguel Tourigny.

 

[xX SEYF Xx]

#13 would never had happen without Romanov for Dach.

#13 did happen with the NYI trade,
we could've stopped there and draft at 13 and at 66

 

[1909]

#13 did happen with the NYI trade,
we could've stopped there and draft at 13 and at 66

Hughes and Gorton did not had that in mind at all. They knew they would select big LW Salf. So they made a trade to get a much needed centerman because they knew they would not claim Wright or Cooley. They would never have traded Romanov for the sake of getting #13 pick.

 

[Garbageyuk]

1. Slafkovsky
13. Nazar/Lekkerimaki
26. Howard/Lamoureux
33. Firkus
63. Hutson
75/93. Dumais

What a haul it could have been.

 

[Treb]

1.) Juraj Slafkovsky
26.) Jagger Firkus
33.) Mattias Havelid
62.) Lane Hutson
75.) Tomas Hamara
92.) Kirill Dolzhenkov
127.) Josh Filmon
130.) Vladimir Grudinin
162.) Matthew Seminoff
194.) Ilya Kvochko
216.) Ratislav Elias

 

[Habano]

Wright (Although in hindsight I like the Slaf pick)
Lambert
Kulich/Trikozov/Firkus
Hutson

 

[ahmedou]

In HuGo I trust.

 

[Whitesnake]

1. Logan Cooley (but fine with Slaf)
26. Owen Beck (ok with Mesar)
33. Jagger Firkus
62. Lane Hutson
75. Jordan Gustafson (Zhilkin or Hamara considered)
92. Jordan Dumais (George, McConnel-Barker and Forsmark considered)
127. Cedric Guindon
130. Vladimir Grudinin
162. Servác Petrovský (Fabien Wagner considered)
194. Thomas Milic
216. Michael Mastrodomenico

All and all, I don't think I hated any of the Habs pick this year. Clearly though I didn't know every pick starting with Engstrom (except of Guindon and Tourigny), I can't say I hated those...don't know them enough. Seems to me that Croteau and Nurmi are the furthest from ever making it if there's a chance. While as far as Tourigny is concerned, I'm just sure he won't make it but could be really serviceable at the AHL Level. Davidson should be helpful in the AHL pretty soon. While Engstrom for the radio round vs known name, was the biggest WTF pick....but hearing about him, he could very well just have suffered from lack of international exposure.

 

[AlexGretzchenvid]

Wow no love for Owen Beck in here , though it was a great pick at #33

1. Wright
13. Lekkeremaki
26. Lambert
33. Luneau/Beck
62. Odelius

He fell. Bit of a risk with who was left on the board especially at defence.

Filip Mesar may have to beat hockey name in this draft

Beside ( Lane Hutson, Connor Geekie, Ty Nelson )

 

[Doublechin]

1-Cooley
26-Kulich
33-Beck
62-Odelius (Hutson was very close)
75-Fisher
92-Forsmark
127-Grudinin
130-Donovan

 

[Mister Hab]

1. Wright (Slaf AND Dach instead makes me happy...but if there was no Dach...I might have been super grumpy/down..... it's basically Wright+Romanov+picks FOR Slaf+Dach)

26. Kulich (but happy with Mesar and it's a nice bonus that Slaf and Mesar are good buddies)

33. Firkus or Hutson or Chesley (but hoping Beck has #2 center potential or VERY solid #3 center potential)

62. Hutson (I still can't believe he was available at 62!! huge huge steal!).

92. Tucker Robertson

216. Logan Morrison

 

[Seb]

Anyone putting Hutson at 62 is lying, we all would've picked him 33!

 

[WeThreeKings]

Anyone putting Hutson at 62 is lying, we all would've picked him 33!

Not me. He was in the discussion but I had Firkus well ahead.

 

[Seb]

Not me. He was in the discussion but I had Firkus well ahead.

Generalising is my hobby

 

[WeThreeKings]

Generalising is my hobby

Nice - Hyperbole used to be mine but Mrb1p's hyperbole has made me realize how cringe it is.