That's pretty much how it started, it was a Kessel for Gallagher deal that I would flat out refuse to do. No denying that Kessel is the better talent, but Gallagher is a more complete hockey player and a much better person at a fraction of the cost....basically Gallagher is low maintenance and Kessel isnt.I'd be curious to see what the top reason of the 70% was. I'd venture that "cost" (to acquire him and his salary) is a non-negligible portion as opposed to him being the devil (albeit a lazy one)