I assume the 2 “foolish $ “ votes were just fat finger mistakes?
Shouldn't worry. I'm sure there was an understanding between the two parties that he would play here for two years then be dealt to a team/area of his choosing. Leafs can take a contract dump in return to make up the difference.Love JT. A mans man. Marleau for a third year is a worry. But JT? Not worries at all.
Last night: Tavares doesn’t dominate a pre season game.
Today: this thread.
Hearing a few people saying that the Leafs would have been better served if they spent the money they signed Tavares for, in other areas of need, IE Karlsson.
It's quite hard to turn him down on July 1st not knowing where or to whom you're allocating the money to.
If I have a concern it's how it effects Marner and his upcoming contract - playing together (also stacking the PP) and having Marner PPG+ and giving him more leverage to earn a contract closer to Matthews rather than Nylander perhaps isn't the best way keep them together long term.
Also physically in terms skating for Tavares after 30 may be an issue, but you can say that for a lot players who's skating isn't their strongest asset.
Most Isle fans would say cap space.Unfortunately, one can't build a perfect team. An elite #1C with prime years remaining seldom reach free agency in the cap era. Dubas seized the opportunity to sign Tavares to a reasonable contract.
Just ask the Islanders, would they rather have Tavares
OR
Cap space that can't be used to sign elite players from FA, because none are available
If you can get John Tavares for free, you ****ing get John Tavares for free
Center depth HELPS wins cups ask Washington and Pittsburgh
Or you can say Tavares is such a fundamentally strong player, always on the right side of the puck, great motor, very good on faceoffs, team leader, great shot that if his wheels slow down a bit he will still be a great asset.
Center depth wins cups ask Washington and Pittsburgh
who is moaning about it?Only our fan base would moan about signing a franchise player